RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
> > = > I did notice that... (the version being the same for Prerequisites) > > Here is the line from the externals definition > > -r 28594 ^/externals/microsoft/Prerequisites Prerequisites > > It is a directory, that contains the VS 2013 and VS 2008 pre-req distribution >

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-06 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > [ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at > the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, > but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] > [ Understood... too many mailing lis

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] [ Understood... too many mailing lists.. ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-04-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ] On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Here is some more info: > > First I show the

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
mixed-revision working copy [28594:29395]; try updating first From: Scott Aron Bloom [mailto:sc...@towel42.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Sv

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM To: Johan Corveleyn Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020 Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Svn up succeeds but does not fix th3 svn merge issue. I'll look at the stack overflow issue since we do have a bunch of

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom &

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > ~~Scott > > Original message > From: Johan Corveleyn > Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) > To: Scott Aron Bloom > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Issue in svn E

RE: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
~~Scott Original message From: Johan Corveleyn Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00) To: Scott Aron Bloom Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020 > Its has been common, that after the merge, if another merge is attempted we > get the E195020

Re: Issue in svn E195020

2015-03-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Running svn from tortoise (1.8.11 r1643975) but we have the same issue with > the same version from VisualSVN, as well as the collabnet on linux > > > > Unfortunately, this is going to be a problem to duplicate this since its > only on our