> You can also put them both on Apache, then there's not that much
> confusion. That's how we do it: two Location blocks in Apache, both
> backed by the same repository:
Hrm, I was kind of hoping to avoid using httpd.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Brodbeck
wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
>> Baring that setting up apache for anon requests and svn for authenticated.
>
> That would also work. In our case we didn't really want the added complexity
> of Apache -- plus I was worrie
>> I think setting up a guest username with no password is the easiest way to
>> go.
>
> That's how we're doing it on our repository. It's a little clumsy, but
> workable for our user population.
You mean like I've done it? e.g.:
svn checkout svn://clanwtf.net/repos/ioUrT-server-4.1
--usern
On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> I think setting up a guest username with no password is the easiest way to go.
That's how we're doing it on our repository. It's a little clumsy, but
workable for our user population.
> Baring that setting up apache for anon requests and svn fo
> > Did you attempt to pass your user credentials with the svn log command?
>
> Yes. There is a discussion regarding that here:
>
> http://subversion.open.collab.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3&viewType=b
> rowseAll&dsMessageId=173879
I think setting up a guest username with no password is th
> Did you attempt to pass your user credentials with the svn log command?
Yes. There is a discussion regarding that here:
http://subversion.open.collab.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3&viewType=browseAll&dsMessageId=173879
> I've found quite a few hits on Google regarding this subject, but I
> have not found any elegant solutions to this problem.
>
> I'm running SVN 1.6.9 (r901367) on FreeBSD (built from ports). I have
> the svnserve daemon running. I'm trying to have some areas of my
> repository be public (requi
