Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-05-05 Thread Doug Robinson
Andreas: On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:28 PM Andreas Stieger wrote: > On 2025-04-30 17:07, Doug Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger >> wrote: >> >>> WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementati

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Stieger
On 2025-04-30 17:07, Doug Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger wrote: WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementation. For synchronous multi-site replication (as opposed to sv

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-30 Thread Doug Robinson
Folks: I missed replying to one more detail that should be corrected. On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger > wrote: > >> WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementation. For >> synchronous multi-site replication (as

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-30 Thread Doug Robinson
Andreas, et. al.: On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger wrote: > > On 2025-04-29 18:53, LWChris wrote: > > Therefore we suspect it was some kind of caching issue in the SVN > > server (WANdisco) due to same path same UUID same commit number; after > > restarting the SVN server, the iss

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Stieger
On 2025-04-29 18:53, LWChris wrote: Therefore we suspect it was some kind of caching issue in the SVN server (WANdisco) due to same path same UUID same commit number; after restarting the SVN server, the issue went away. But I don't know if WANdisco is a "typical server implementation", or if

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-29 Thread LWChris
On 2025-04-28 18:11, Andreas Stieger wrote:> However, I am not aware of anything breaking for the server itself, access to the on-disk repository date is purely path based unless I am mistaken.We noticed the issue that all had the same UUID while we were trying to figure out a problem we encountere

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-28 Thread Andreas Stieger
On 2025-04-28 17:11, LWChris wrote: I intend to quick fix that by calling "svnadmin setuuid" after copying the template, for future repositories. Correct. Recommended for future repositories. But what to do about the existing ones? What are the implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server?

Re: Implications of duplicate UUIDs on a server

2025-04-28 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi, Den mån 28 apr. 2025 kl 17:18 skrev LWChris : > Hi, > > for a long time, a company I am working with now has set up new > repositories using a “template” repository, which is a folder on the server > with a “configured but empty” repository, that was just copied over and > over to the SVN ser