On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Itamar O wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Philipp Kloke wrote:
>>
>> ?I am not sure if I am answering correctly (because I usually do not use
>> mailing lists, I just selected the "Answer to all" button of my mail
>> program), but I hope so.
>>
>> I now che
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Philipp Kloke wrote:
> ?I am not sure if I am answering correctly (because I usually do not use
> mailing lists, I just selected the "Answer to all" button of my mail
> program), but I hope so.
> I now checked the code again, but with a newer version of cppcheck.
ld like to try to check the code by yourself, see
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcheck/ (the tool is very easy to use)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
From: Hyrum K. Wright
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:56 PM
To: Philipp Kloke
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Checked S
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Philipp Kloke wrote:
>> ?Hi,
>>
>> I used cppcheck to analyze the source code of Subversion.
>> Cppcheck claims to have found five errors and some style problems.
>>
>> Please have a look on the result file i
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Philipp Kloke wrote:
> ?Hi,
>
> I used cppcheck to analyze the source code of Subversion.
> Cppcheck claims to have found five errors and some style problems.
>
> Please have a look on the result file in the attachement.
Thanks for the feedback! I'll look at makin
