Re: AW: AW: AW: Segmentation Fault with SVN Client related to serf

2015-01-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.01.2015 10:46, pierre.vi...@postfinance.ch wrote: > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015 14:51 >> An: Viret Pierre, PF54 >> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Segmentation Faul

Re: AW: AW: AW: Segmentation Fault with SVN Client related to serf

2015-01-08 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > I can't reproduce this against a standard server. I think I have worked it out. There was an error in my script: one of the XML response lines was missing a '\n' and this originally caused the client to report the HTTP response as too short, so I "fixed" it by added a tr

Re: AW: AW: AW: Segmentation Fault with SVN Client related to serf

2015-01-08 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > I've converted your trace into a Python script to implement a server > that behaves like yours. I may have reproduced the problem. If I remove the 'Connection: close' headers and continue to force v1 I can get the client to crash using the dummy server. I suppose that m

Re: AW: AW: AW: Segmentation Fault with SVN Client related to serf

2015-01-08 Thread Philip Martin
writes: > The status line is not blocked. The debugging message means that we > have got an header with a null key and with the status line as value: > in this case the header is not added to the request sent back to the > client. This seems to be common that some HTTP Implementations return > su