"Hartleroad, James [IT]" writes:
> Just trying to get a better understanding on why svnlook shows the
> files when reviewing one commit and not the other, when both commits
> "changed" what was in the repository, at least to the point that the
> files are copied to the new location.
You might wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Hartleroad, James [IT] [mailto:james.hartler...@sprint.com]
> Sent: maandag 23 november 2015 17:24
> To: Ivan Zhakov
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: svnlook changed doesn't include all of the files that are part of
&g
to the new
location.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 8:51 AM
To: Hartleroad, James [IT]
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svnlook changed doesn't include all of the files that are part of
the commit
On 23 Nove
Diff reports copies of directories as adds of the individual files, while
svnlook changed reports a copy on the root and only interesting changes
below that. Just like how 'svn status' would have reported it before the
commit.
Bert
From: Hartleroad, James [IT] [mailto:james.
On 23 November 2015 at 17:29, Hartleroad, James [IT]
wrote:
> Why doesn’t svnlook changed show all of the files that are part of the
> commit?
>
> A developer created a new directory with two files in a branch and the
> branch was merged into another branch. When running svnlook it shows the
> di
