Thorsten Schöning a écrit :
Guten Tag Eric Manceau,
am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 um 17:50 schrieben Sie:
As you can see we want to gather all tests of several differents repos
into a unique repo but we want to keep revision of the original repos
and it seems to be hard to achieve.
Maybe imposs
Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Eric Manceau
wrote:
Hello,
I am struggling with an old version of subversion : 1.4.2
Is it safe for the repository to adopt the 1.6.16 version?
It's also *wise* to upgrade, especially if your older repo is using
the older
Guten Tag Eric Manceau,
am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011 um 17:50 schrieben Sie:
> As you can see we want to gather all tests of several differents repos
> into a unique repo but we want to keep revision of the original repos
> and it seems to be hard to achieve.
> Maybe impossible?
If disk space is not
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Eric Manceau
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am struggling with an old version of subversion : 1.4.2
> Is it safe for the repository to adopt the 1.6.16 version?
It's also *wise* to upgrade, especially if your older repo is using
the older and notoriously fragile Berkeley
Thanks for quick answer.
Bob Archer a écrit :
I am struggling with an old version of subversion : 1.4.2 Is it
safe for the repository to adopt the 1.6.16 version?
Yes... make sure you svn upgrade the repo or do a dump/load cycle to bring it
up to the newest repository format.
Okay I
> I am struggling with an old version of subversion : 1.4.2 Is it
> safe for the repository to adopt the 1.6.16 version?
Yes... make sure you svn upgrade the repo or do a dump/load cycle to bring it
up to the newest repository format.
> Moreover I want to split an old repos in 2 new repos witho
