Re: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-22 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Op maandag 21 mrt 2011 17:18 CET schreef Ryan Schmidt: >> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking >> at the version, I see: >> svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) >> compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34 >> >> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but stil

RE: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-21 Thread Tony Sweeney
This isn't on Ubuntu Hardy LTS by any chance, is it? Because that just happens to be the latest backported version on that platform. As others have already said, you should move to either 1.5.latest or 1.6.latest. Tony. > -Original Message- > From: Cecil Westerhof [mailto:ce...@decebal.

Re: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-21 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking > at the version, I see: >    svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) >       compiled Mar  1 2011, 17:20:34 > > I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but

Re: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-21 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Op maandag 21 mrt 2011 17:20 CET schreef Andy Levy: >> I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking >> at the version, I see: >>    svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) >>       compiled Mar  1 2011, 17:20:34 >> >> I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but

Re: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-21 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking > at the version, I see: >    svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) >       compiled Mar  1 2011, 17:20:34 > > I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but sti

Re: Upgrade subversion 1.5.1

2011-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > I am asked to implement a repository system for a client. When looking > at the version, I see: >svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) > compiled Mar 1 2011, 17:20:34 > > I find this a bit strange. Only three weeks ago compiled, but still