ariables.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Srihari M
>
> IT4IT - Operational Tools
>
> Infosys Limited
>
>
>
> *From:* Andreas Stieger [mailto:andreas.stie...@gmx.de]
> *Sent:* 01 April, 2014 3:47 PM
> *To:* Mylswamy Srihari, (srihari.mylsw...@partner.bmw.d
15:43
To: srihari.mylsw...@partner.bmw.de; andreas.stie...@gmx.de
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion upgrade
Hi,
It looks like your Subversion version wasn’t tested against apr 0.9.20.
As Apr 0.9 is out of support for quite some time I would recommend
@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion upgrade
Hello,
I executed the my-build and got the below error, please help how to change APR
variables.
Thanks,
Srihari M
IT4IT - Operational Tools
Infosys Limited
From: Andreas Stieger [mailto:andreas.stie...@gmx.de]
Sent: 01 April
Srihari, (srihari.mylsw...@partner.bmw.de)
Cc:
Subject: Re: Subversion upgrade
Hello,
On 1 Apr 2014, at 14:33,
mailto:srihari.mylsw...@partner.bmw.de>> wrote:
We are planning to upgrade SVN 1.8 from SVN1.7, please help me how to do the
upgradation with basic steps.
Read the 1.8 release not
Hello,
> On 1 Apr 2014, at 14:33, wrote:
>
> We are planning to upgrade SVN 1.8 from SVN1.7, please help me how to do the
> upgradation with basic steps.
Read the 1.8 release notes and the upgrade considerations mentioned there.
Andreas
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> Are you upgrading the client or the server?
The client.
We think we may have located the problem. The user also had Tortoise
installed, and it was an older version. We're trying to determine
whether upgrading will resolve.
--
Parrish S. Kn
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > If he can reproduce this problem even with patches applied, please ask
> > him to report this as a new security issue with a reproduction recipe
> > included. Please see
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/issues.html#
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> You could check if you can still see a libsvn_delta-1.dll (or similarly
> named file) left over from the old installation.
The only "libsvn" files I find on search are in the Subversion 1.7.7
directory, so that doesn't appear to be the pr
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:55:33AM -0400, Parrish Knight wrote:
> > Are you sure the Subversion upgrade was done properly?
>
> I used Control Panel to uninstall the previous version, then I
> downloaded and unZIPped the most current version. Is there anythin I
> may have overlooked?
That sounds
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> If he can reproduce this problem even with patches applied, please
> ask him to report this as a new security issue with a reproduction
> recipe included. Please see
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/issues.html#security
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 08:58:49AM -0400, Parrish Knight wrote:
> The reported problem is with earlier versions of Subversion, but our
> security officer reports that the problem persists even after an
> upgrade.
>
> "Multiple integer overflows in the libsvn_delta library in Subversion
> before 1.5
Guten Tag Parrish Knight,
am Montag, 22. Oktober 2012 um 14:43 schrieben Sie:
> Any assistance that anyone might be able to give would be much
> appreciated.
Could you please mention the exact problem you have or did I just
oversee it? What vulnerability or problem are you talking about?
Mit fre
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 08:43:16AM -0400, Parrish Knight wrote:
>> Good morning:
>>
>> I am the Help Desk Lead at the National Geodetic Survey, an agency of
>> NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Currently,
>> I am i
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 08:43:16AM -0400, Parrish Knight wrote:
> Good morning:
>
> I am the Help Desk Lead at the National Geodetic Survey, an agency of
> NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Currently,
> I am in the process of migrating one of our developers from a rather
On 29/09/11 05:33, Rajesh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:44:33 -0500:
2011/9/21 Ulrich Eckhardt:
Am 21.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Hyrum K Wright:
[repository upgrade]
Since you are moving from 1.4 to 1.7, however, yo
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:44:33 -0500:
>> 2011/9/21 Ulrich Eckhardt :
>> > Am 21.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Hyrum K Wright:
>> > [repository upgrade]
>> >>
>> >> Since you are moving from 1.4 to 1.7, however, you may want to
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:44:33 -0500:
> 2011/9/21 Ulrich Eckhardt :
> > Am 21.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Hyrum K Wright:
> > [repository upgrade]
> >>
> >> Since you are moving from 1.4 to 1.7, however, you may want to run
> >> 'svnadmin
> >> upgrade' on the new repositories, to
2011/9/21 Ulrich Eckhardt :
> Am 21.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Hyrum K Wright:
> [repository upgrade]
>>
>> Since you are moving from 1.4 to 1.7, however, you may want to run
>> 'svnadmin
>> upgrade' on the new repositories, to enable new features available
>> since 1.4.
>
> Wait: I was under the impre
Guten Tag PR,
am Mittwoch, 21. September 2011 um 06:28 schrieben Sie:
> The only fact that left me a bit puzzled was that the repository format
> still showed 5, inspite of doing a svnadmin verify with subversion 1.7 rc3
> with no error reported, ...
This is because svnadmin verify doesn't change
Am 21.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Hyrum K Wright:
[repository upgrade]
Since you are moving from 1.4 to 1.7, however, you may want to run 'svnadmin
upgrade' on the new repositories, to enable new features available
since 1.4.
Wait: I was under the impression that this enabled new features _as far
a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
> Am 21.09.2011 06:28, schrieb PR:
>>
>> of course client side push to all the dev desktops with
>> subversion 1.7 will also be done simultaneously.
>
> This is not necessary, you can switch one client first, then other clients
> and finally
Am 21.09.2011 06:28, schrieb PR:
of course client side push to all the dev desktops with
subversion 1.7 will also be done simultaneously.
This is not necessary, you can switch one client first, then other
clients and finally switch the server. BTW: 1.7 is still not yet
released, though it's r
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 07:49:34 -0400:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Kriparam Faraday
>
> > Wouldn't he have to run svnadmin upgrade or do a dump/load to get the
> > repository in the newest version format to ta
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Kriparam Faraday
> Wouldn't he have to run svnadmin upgrade or do a dump/load to get the
> repository in the newest version format to take advantage of the new storage
> / merge features?
svnadmin hotcopy wor
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Kriparam Faraday
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have an existing subversion setup running using
> apache(mod_dav_svn). We
> > are looking to upgrade the subversion from 1.4.3 to 1.6. Can
> someone guide
> > me the steps needed in upgrading it?
>
> I strongly urge you to
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Kriparam Faraday wrote:
> Hi,
> We have an existing subversion setup running using apache(mod_dav_svn). We
> are looking to upgrade the subversion from 1.4.3 to 1.6. Can someone guide
> me the steps needed in upgrading it?
I strongly urge you to:
* Move aside yoru
Hello,
I agree that dump/restore is the best option but in some cases,
a repository may be so large that dump/restore is unpratical.
The "svnadmin upgrade" command is a minimal operation to do but your repository
structure will not be sharded (if it comes from 1.4 for instance).
My preference i
On Friday 25 Jun 2010, abhinav.chan...@rbs.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using Subversion 1.5.2 and want to upgrade to Subversion
> 1.6.6.
>
> Upon going through subversion documentation, we found that there can be two
> ways of doing this:
>
> 1. Installing a new Subversion 1.6.6 instance
28 matches
Mail list logo