> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: zaterdag 3 september 2016 12:49
> To: Alfred von Campe
> Cc: Bert Huijben ; Israel Sadeh vision.com>; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN Feature Request: Selecting the revision
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:15:50PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2016, at 16:22, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > If you need a specific set of property changes in your tag, you
> > can create a working copy which contains the necessary changes
> > and then copy this working copy to a ta
On Sep 2, 2016, at 16:22, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> If you need a specific set of property changes in your tag, you
> can create a working copy which contains the necessary changes
> and then copy this working copy to a tag.
Yes, I understand this, but...
> We cannot automate details of everybod
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:48:03PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2016, at 4:07, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> > A single argument specifying a revision may only work for very specific
> > scenarios. The --pin-externals feature also works when you have dozens of
> > externals, all point
On Sep 2, 2016, at 4:07, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> A single argument specifying a revision may only work for very specific
> scenarios. The --pin-externals feature also works when you have dozens of
> externals, all pointing towards different repositories.
Right, but could you consider the follo
A single argument specifying a revision may only work for very specific
scenarios. The --pin-externals feature also works when you have dozens of
externals, all pointing towards different repositories.
When adding the feature we determined that we can't handle all these
additional cases using t
