On Dec 8, 2010, at 08:37, Merkle Andreas wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> If the text you type into the document will appear in the binary file in
>> plain text (as it seems to in Word files for example), then you can use
>> Subversion keywords as you would in any text file. Subversion has
>>
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, I wrote:
> use tags in a separate tag repository.
^^
That's supposed to read "directory", of course.
Uli
--
ML: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html
FAQ: http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html
Docs
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Merkle Andreas wrote:
> we have a lot of binary files, e. g. word documents, schematics, etc.,
> which are containing the revision number. If such a file is updated, it
> won't be possible to estimate the revision which the file really get.
I'd say the general advise
Guten Tag Merkle Andreas,
am Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2010 um 15:37 schrieben Sie:
> That's a workaround for the binary files, which contains the keywords as
> plain text. Ok.
> But it is not really safe ... there is still a probability that the
> binary will be corrupt afterwards.
> And it doesn't
That's a workaround for the binary files, which contains the keywords as plain
text. Ok.
But it is not really safe ... there is still a probability that the binary will
be corrupt afterwards.
And it doesn't work for all the other binary files, e.g. schematics, etc.
Anyway thanks for the idea.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 07:39, Merkle Andreas wrote:
> we have a lot of binary files, e. g. word documents, schematics, etc., which
> are containing the revision number.
> If such a file is updated, it won’t be possible to estimate the revision
> which the file really get.
> Example:
> Document A ha
Hi,
we have a lot of binary files, e. g. word documents, schematics, etc., which
are containing the revision number.
If such a file is updated, it won't be possible to estimate the revision which
the file really get.
Example:
Document A has rev. 10 ... now I lock it, update it and write rev. 11
