Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-23 Thread Philip Martin
Martin Wam writes: > I'm having some issues with dbx, but was able to extract the following > stacktrace: > > Segmentation fault in apr_palloc at line 681 in file > "memory/unix/apr_pools.c" ($t1) > 681 active = pool->active; > (dbx) where > apr_palloc(pool = 0xfffeee88, in_size = 20),

Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Wam
Philip Martin wandisco.com> writes: > > Martin Wam esito.no> writes: > > >> That looks as if it could be a problem with APR's mmap support on AIX. > >> Which version of APR are you using? Did you build the APR binaries > >> yourself? Did whoever built the binaries run the APR regression >

Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-22 Thread Philip Martin
Martin Wam writes: >> That looks as if it could be a problem with APR's mmap support on AIX. >> Which version of APR are you using? Did you build the APR binaries >> yourself? Did whoever built the binaries run the APR regression >> tests? > > We are using apr version 1.5.1-1 downloaded from p

Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-22 Thread Martin Wam
Philip Martin wandisco.com> writes: > > Martin Wam esito.no> writes: > > > We are also experiencing the same issues on AIX 7.1 (having tried all > > versions from 1.8.5 to 1.8.10). A backtrace from the coredump shows: > > > > Core was generated by `svn'. > > Program terminated with signal SI

Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-21 Thread Philip Martin
Martin Wam writes: > We are also experiencing the same issues on AIX 7.1 (having tried all > versions from 1.8.5 to 1.8.10). A backtrace from the coredump shows: > > Core was generated by `svn'. > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > #0 0xd82f169c in apr_palloc () from

Re: Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-21 Thread Martin Wam
> To: Ryan Schmidt > > Subject: SV: Possible bug in subversion > > Date: January 16, 2015 at 3:27:03 AM CST > > > > Hi, > > > > svn server version: > > > > svnserve --version > > svnserve, version 1.8.5 (r1542147) > > compiled N

Fwd: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I'm forwarding your response back to the list so that hopefully someone can help you. Remember to use Reply All so that the discussion stays on the list. Begin forwarded message: > From: Jon-Erik TYVAND > To: Ryan Schmidt > Subject: SV: Possible bug in subversion > Date: Janu

Re: Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 15, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Jon-Erik TYVAND wrote: > We use subversion on AIX 6.1 and it works perfectly! But on AIX 7.1 we get a > Segmention fault(coredump) using svn co. We have tried several of the aix 7.1 > rpm supplied from perlz. Is this a known bug? What versions of Subversion are yo

Possible bug in subversion

2015-01-15 Thread Jon-Erik TYVAND
Hello, We use subversion on AIX 6.1 and it works perfectly! But on AIX 7.1 we get a Segmention fault(coredump) using svn co. We have tried several of the aix 7.1 rpm supplied from perlz. Is this a known bug? test30:/home/rumo/tmp> svn co http://tvinnsvn:8080/svn/tvinn/trunk/dev/felles Authenti

Re: Strange race-condition/possible bug in Subversion 1.7.0

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 18:06:37 -0500: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Harald Wilhelmi > wrote: > > > >    svn copy a b > >    echo -n yyy >b > >    svn commit -m 'c2' . > > > > Of cause I expect 'b' to contain 'yyy'. However sometimes it > > contains 'xxx'. After this the r

Re: Strange race-condition/possible bug in Subversion 1.7.0

2011-10-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Harald Wilhelmi wrote: > >    svn copy a b >    echo -n yyy >b >    svn commit -m 'c2' . > > Of cause I expect 'b' to contain 'yyy'. However sometimes it > contains 'xxx'. After this the repository is all consistent and fine > in my opinion (expect that 'a' has the

Strange race-condition/possible bug in Subversion 1.7.0

2011-10-19 Thread Harald Wilhelmi
Hi, in the last weeks I developed a little Subversion tool. When I heard about Subversion 1.7.0 I downloaded the source at the next opportunity to run the functional tests against the new version. With the new version two of the tests fail *sometimes*. The tests use the command line and do about

AW: Corrupted FSFS commit - possible bug in subversion 1.6.5?

2010-04-20 Thread Kutter, Martin
> Hi, > > we encountered (again) the error already discussed in the > earlier thread > "Corrupted FSFS commit" (starting February 25). Update: Server version: 1.6.5 Client version: 1.6.7 Martin

Corrupted FSFS commit - possible bug in subversion 1.6.5?

2010-04-19 Thread Kutter, Martin
Hi, we encountered (again) the error already discussed in the earlier thread "Corrupted FSFS commit" (starting February 25). When checking out a reporitory from a subversion 1.6.5 server via https (apache 2.2), a client receives a connection abort. The log file states "Svndiff contains a too-