On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 31 August 2016 at 14:54, Vacelet, Manuel
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 31 August 2016 at 13:28, Vacelet, Manuel >
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> >> >
On 31 August 2016 at 14:54, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 31 August 2016 at 13:28, Vacelet, Manuel
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > - Why this behaviour changed between 1.6 and n
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 31 August 2016 at 13:28, Vacelet, Manuel
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > - Why this behaviour changed between 1.6 and newer ?
> >> It was bug before Subversion 1.7.9. The problem was t
On 31 August 2016 at 13:28, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>>
>> > - Why this behaviour changed between 1.6 and newer ?
>> It was bug before Subversion 1.7.9. The problem was that client tried
>> to read some information from repository root when
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> > - Why this behaviour changed between 1.6 and newer ?
> It was bug before Subversion 1.7.9. The problem was that client tried
> to read some information from repository root when performing remove
> folder. See SVN-4332 for more details [1
On 31 August 2016 at 13:04, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 25 August 2016 at 12:19, Vacelet, Manuel
>> wrote:
[...]
>
> Ivan,
>
Hi Manuel,
> I don't think it the same issue as in my case, the users always have access
> to repository root.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 12:19, Vacelet, Manuel
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel >
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
> >
On 8/25/2016 11:52 AM, Stefan Hett wrote:
On 8/25/2016 11:35 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 12:30, Stefan Hett wrote:
On 8/25/2016 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
oops I h
On 8/25/2016 11:35 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 12:30, Stefan Hett wrote:
On 8/25/2016 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
oops I hit shift+enter :/
see my message below
On W
On 25 August 2016 at 12:30, Stefan Hett wrote:
> On 8/25/2016 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
>>> wrote:
oops I hit shift+enter :/
see my message below
On We
On 8/25/2016 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
oops I hit shift+enter :/
see my message below
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
wrote:
Hi all,
I got a machine that was bump
On 25 August 2016 at 12:19, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> oops I hit shift+enter :/
>> >> see my message belo
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> oops I hit shift+enter :/
> >> see my message below
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
>
On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
> wrote:
>>
>> oops I hit shift+enter :/
>> see my message below
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Vacelet, Manuel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I got a machine that was bumped from 1.6
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> oops I hit shift+enter :/
> see my message below
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Vacelet, Manuel <
> manuel.vace...@enalean.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I got a machine that was bumped from 1.6.x (centos6 default) to 1.8.16
>> (than
oops I hit shift+enter :/
see my message below
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I got a machine that was bumped from 1.6.x (centos6 default) to 1.8.16
> (thanks wandisco!).
> I identified a change of behaviour but failed to find an explanation in
> book or ch
Hi all,
I got a machine that was bumped from 1.6.x (centos6 default) to 1.8.16
(thanks wandisco!).
I identified a change of behaviour but failed to find an explanation in
book or change log.
Here we go, given a SVNAccessFile like:
17 matches
Mail list logo