Ryan J Ollos wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 17:43:44 -0700:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 21:48:38 +:
> > > Ryan J Ollos wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:23:37 -0700:
> > > > For a long time I've known the rule "don't
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 21:48:38 +:
> > Ryan J Ollos wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:23:37 -0700:
> > > For a long time I've known the rule "don't modify a transaction in a
> > > pre-commit hook", documented in (1) a
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 21:48:38 +:
> Ryan J Ollos wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:23:37 -0700:
> > For a long time I've known the rule "don't modify a transaction in a
> > pre-commit hook", documented in (1) and recently repeated in (2).
> >
> > I was therefore surprised
Ryan J Ollos wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 14:23:37 -0700:
> For a long time I've known the rule "don't modify a transaction in a
> pre-commit hook", documented in (1) and recently repeated in (2).
>
> I was therefore surprised to read about the "svnadmin setrevprop" command
> (3) in 1.9, and to s
For a long time I've known the rule "don't modify a transaction in a
pre-commit hook", documented in (1) and recently repeated in (2).
I was therefore surprised to read about the "svnadmin setrevprop" command
(3) in 1.9, and to see an example of modifying transaction properties in
the hook-scripts