Am 2018-09-09 um 23:41 schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
Michael Osipov wrote on Sun, 09 Sep 2018 20:35 +0200:
I would expect the help output to contain information that target which
do not explicitly have [@PEGREV] documented are still subject to peg rev
parsing and can cause subtile error messages which
Michael Osipov wrote on Sun, 09 Sep 2018 20:35 +0200:
> I would expect the help output to contain information that target which
> do not explicitly have [@PEGREV] documented are still subject to peg rev
> parsing and can cause subtile error messages which cannot be explained
> via help:
> > expo
Am 2018-09-09 um 14:20 schrieb Mark Phippard:
On Sep 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-09-09 um 13:50 schrieb Mark Phippard:
Any thoughts?
If I understand your examples, you are showing what happens when the filename
contains an @, right? If so, this is addressed in the bo
On 09.09.2018 14:20, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
>> Am 2018-09-09 um 13:50 schrieb Mark Phippard:
>> Any thoughts?
> If I understand your examples, you are showing what happens when the
> filename contains an @, right? If so, this is addre
On Sep 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Am 2018-09-09 um 13:50 schrieb Mark Phippard:
> Any thoughts?
If I understand your examples, you are showing what happens when the
filename contains an @, right? If so, this is addressed in the book in
this paragraph:
>>>
Am 2018-09-09 um 13:50 schrieb Mark Phippard:
Any thoughts?
If I understand your examples, you are showing what happens when the filename
contains an @, right? If so, this is addressed in the book in this paragraph:
Correct.
"The perceptive reader is probably wondering at this point whet
>>> Any thoughts?
>> If I understand your examples, you are showing what happens when the
>> filename contains an @, right? If so, this is addressed in the book in this
>> paragraph:
>
> Correct.
>
>> "The perceptive reader is probably wondering at this point whether the peg
>> revision syn
Am 2018-09-09 um 13:33 schrieb Mark Phippard:
On Sep 9, 2018, at 6:46 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Folks,
while working on SCM-859 I have found some oddities on Subversion 1.9.7 and
1.10.2.
Here are some examples for me which shall not be marked as an error or the
documentation does not ment
> On Sep 9, 2018, at 6:46 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> while working on SCM-859 I have found some oddities on Subversion 1.9.7 and
> 1.10.2.
>
> Here are some examples for me which shall not be marked as an error or the
> documentation does not mention @REV/@PEG at all:
>
> > PS
Folks,
while working on SCM-859 I have found some oddities on Subversion 1.9.7
and 1.10.2.
Here are some examples for me which shall not be marked as an error or
the documentation does not mention @REV/@PEG at all:
> PS D:\Entwicklung\Projekte\toll@repo@test> svn info
> Path: .
> Working Co
10 matches
Mail list logo
