On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> According to the paper, you *are*. You're mirring the backend
> Subversion databases on the multiple servers, keeping them
> synchronized by accepting only authorized transactions on a designated
> "master" and relaying them to the ot
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Ian Wild wrote:
> Hi Nico,
> Can I start by offering to provide a trial copy of Subversion Multisite (or
> even a pre-configured virtual environment to save you time) for you to prove
> to yourself how we solve these challenges? Many enterprise SVN deployments
> us
Hi Nico,
Can I start by offering to provide a trial copy of Subversion Multisite (or
even a pre-configured virtual environment to save you time) for you to prove
to yourself how we solve these challenges? Many enterprise SVN deployments
use our software and if your assertions were true that certai
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Michael Diers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-04-21 13:58, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Ian Wild wrote:
>>
>>> That sounds like a good translation to me. The maths gets complicated to put
>>> it
t; Best Wishes,
>
> Ian
>
> --
> Ian Wild
> Chief Solutions Architect
> WANdisco, Inc.
> http://www.wandisco.com
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-can-I-setup-two-svnservers-with-svnsync-and-both-should-provide-checkout-and-checkins-tp31440398p31476019.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Michael Diers wrote:
> While your observation regarding merging is correct, it does not apply
> to the replication technique that WANdisco use in their product.
>
> The network nodes handling the repositories are distributed, but not
> isolated. The nodes actively
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-04-21 13:58, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Ian Wild wrote:
>
>> That sounds like a good translation to me. The maths gets complicated to put
>> it mildly, but I know Dr Yeturu's work is in some part at least base
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Ian Wild wrote:
> That sounds like a good translation to me. The maths gets complicated to put
> it mildly, but I know Dr Yeturu's work is in some part at least based on
> Paxos ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paxos_algorithm ). AIUI we've got the
> only implementa
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Translating from Patentese to English, I think it basically says "This is
> the we solve the Consensus Problem" (one of the standard problems in
> theoretical distributed computing).
>
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
That sounds like a good tr
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:22 +0100, "Ian Wild" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Ian Wild wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 13:28:53 +0100:
> > > using our own patented active-active replication technology.
> >
> > What is the patent number?
> >
>
> Thanks for askin
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ian Wild wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 13:28:53 +0100:
> > using our own patented active-active replication technology.
>
> What is the patent number?
>
Thanks for asking.
US20080140726 and WO 2006/076530
Ian
--
Ian Wild
Chief Solutions
Ian Wild wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 13:28:53 +0100:
> using our own patented active-active replication technology.
What is the patent number?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt <
subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote:
For full multiple-master capability, you'll have to look elsewhere. For
> example, WANdisco is a commercial product that's based on Subversion that
> offers this.
>
> http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/multisi
Guten Tag phaneedra,
am Mittwoch, 20. April 2011 um 13:23 schrieben Sie:
> More clearly I have two servers at different location. I have to make sync
> and provide access to users to check in and check out from any of the
> server. Not as mirror.
This is not possible at the moment. You may want t
On Apr 20, 2011, at 06:23, phaneedra wrote:
> I didn't get information related to setup two svnservers with svnsync by
> providing checkin and checkout on two servers.
>
> More clearly I have two servers at different location. I have to make sync
> and provide access to users to check in and che
irror.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-can-I-setup-two-svnservers-with-svnsync-and-both-should-provide-checkout-and-checkins-tp31440398p31440398.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 matches
Mail list logo
