That sounds right to me, thanks Stefan!
Eric
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Eric Berge wrote:
> > The original patch file I used is attached.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
> Thanks, I could reproduce the problem and fix i
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Eric Berge wrote:
> The original patch file I used is attached.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eric
>
Thanks, I could reproduce the problem and fix it.
See http://svn.apache.org/r1592014
I've nominated the fix for backport to 1.8.x so it should appear
in some future 1
The original patch file I used is attached.
Thanks!
Eric
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:30:33PM -0500, Eric Berge wrote:
> > I was running "svn patch" with a patch I created with "git diff" and it
> > failed to apply, however it applies ju
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:30:33PM -0500, Eric Berge wrote:
> I was running "svn patch" with a patch I created with "git diff" and it
> failed to apply, however it applies just fine with the default "patch"
> command on my Rhel 6.5 system.
>
> This is due to the "extended header" information that
I was running "svn patch" with a patch I created with "git diff" and it
failed to apply, however it applies just fine with the default "patch"
command on my Rhel 6.5 system.
This is due to the "extended header" information that git puts before the
actual diff in some cases. I validated this by re