On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Of course you _can_ secure it. My point is that permitting ssh and
>> restricting access to ssh by itself is very likely to make your system less
>> secure (if you count on firewal
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Of course you _can_ secure it. My point is that permitting ssh and
> restricting access to ssh by itself is very likely to make your system less
> secure (if you count on firewall protections) instead of more so. And
> nothing that can be don
On 1/5/2011 1:04 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access,
disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are
the odds that port tunneling or ssh's built i
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>>
>> It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
>> block other services at the firewall,
>>
>
> If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are the o
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
>> block other services at the firewall,
>
> If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are the odds
>
On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are the
odds that port tunneling or ssh's built in socks proxy will allow acc
[ Changing the subject line, this has gone off the deep end, partly my fault. ]
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Tony Sweeney wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
>>It's not cow. Subversion security is *goat*. Inexpensive to buy the
>>unprepa
