Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:15AM +, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi Stefan > > > I've added a new section to the book explaining how to keep > > a branch alive after reintegration. > > Thanks very much for adding this new section. This method may well be > useful to us. Currently, we are running

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread Tyler Roscoe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:15AM +, David Aldrich wrote: > Currently, we are running svn client 1.6.9 against svn server 1.5.2. > Will this combination support the "svn merge --record-only" method > that you described? Yes. tyler

RE: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-22 Thread David Aldrich
Hi Stefan > I've added a new section to the book explaining how to keep > a branch alive after reintegration. Thanks very much for adding this new section. This method may well be useful to us. Currently, we are running svn client 1.6.9 against svn server 1.5.2. Will this combination support t

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-17 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:42:25PM -0500, Pat Farrell wrote: > While SVN seems to have an active support community, I'm not seeing > parallel evidence of active support for the documentation. > > for example, in another thread, Mike Dixon wrote: > > Uh? What's wrong with --reintegrate? > > Well f

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-17 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:36:19AM -0500, Pat Farrell wrote: > I've never yet found a good developer who is good at writing > documentation. I've been doing this for nearly 40 years. I do actually tend to like writing documentation sometimes. No idea if it's really any good. But I've been contribu

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-16 Thread Pat Farrell
Ed wrote: > It's a free book written mostly by those coding the project - check > out the repo and keep yourself up to date with cron. > I recommend the Vendor Branching feature. think of it as a teachable moment... > > strange how a version control project keeps it's book in a repo > > no sn

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-16 Thread Ed
Pat, It's a free book written mostly by those coding the project - check out the repo and keep yourself up to date with cron. I recommend the Vendor Branching feature. think of it as a teachable moment... strange how a version control project keeps it's book in a repo no snivelling! On Tue,

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-16 Thread Pat Farrell
Andy Levy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 21:05, Pat Farrell wrote: >> When will the 1.6 version, with all the "changed a lot" be part of the >> public website? > > It's always been accessible, use the "nightly" version of the > documentation. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/index.html T

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-16 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 21:05, Pat Farrell wrote: > Mike Dixon wrote: >> Incidentally, I really would recommend reading the latest version of >> the entire svn book, especially Chapter 4, Branching and Merging. >> This stuff changed a lot with 1.5 (and again with the tree conflict >> system in 1.6

Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

2010-02-16 Thread Pat Farrell
Mike Dixon wrote: > Incidentally, I really would recommend reading the latest version of > the entire svn book, especially Chapter 4, Branching and Merging. > This stuff changed a lot with 1.5 (and again with the tree conflict > system in 1.6), and there is a lot of historical discussion that has >