Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 15, 2010, at 22:09, Jeremy Conlin wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> No, it means the version of Subversion that is directly reading the >>> repository is older than the version of Subversion that create

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 22:09, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> No, it means the version of Subversion that is directly reading the >> repository is older than the version of Subversion that created the >> repository. >> >> "Directly reading" means proba

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > >> I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list.  I'm getting the error: >> >> svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' >> >> If I understand correctly, this means that my local ver

Re: Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 15, 2010, at 16:12, Jeremy Conlin wrote: > I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list. I'm getting the error: > > svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' > > If I understand correctly, this means that my local version of svn > differs from the remote version of svn. Is th

Expected format problem

2010-03-15 Thread Jeremy Conlin
I'll bet this is an oft asked question on this list. I'm getting the error: svn: Expected FS format '2'; found format '4' If I understand correctly, this means that my local version of svn differs from the remote version of svn. Is this right? I installed 1.6.9 today on both my local version a