Hi, Daniel,
> Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>
> Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20:11 +0200:
> >
> > What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an
incompatible
> > / unknown working copy format which was written by a future
subversion
> > version?
Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20:11 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
> unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
> version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
>
> My idea was to run status with depth=empty
Hi, Daniel,
> Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20:11 +0200:
> > What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an
incompatible
> > / unknown working copy format which was written by a future
subversion
> > version? (e. G.
Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20:11 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
> unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
> version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
>
> My idea was to run status with depth=empty
2011/5/13 Markus Schaber :
> Hi,
>
> What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
> unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
> version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
>
In the change log for Subversion 1.6 [1] there is the following line for 1.6.9.
Hi, Les,
> Von: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
[> ]
> >> What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible
> >> / unknown working copy format which was written by a future
> >> subversion version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
> >>
> >> My idea was to run status with
Hi, Erik,
> Von: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehu...@gmail.com]
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Markus Schaber software.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible
> > / unknown working copy format which was written by a futur
On 5/13/11 7:30 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
My idea was to run status with depth=empty on the workingcopy root, and
che
Hi Markus,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
> unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
> version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
>
> My idea was to run status with depth
Hi,
What is the safest future-compatible way to check for an incompatible /
unknown working copy format which was written by a future subversion
version? (e. G. WC-NG by SVN 1.7?)
My idea was to run status with depth=empty on the workingcopy root, and
check for SVN_ERR_WC_UNSUPPORTED_FORMAT error
10 matches
Mail list logo