Re: Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory

2011-05-11 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 10, 2011, at 20:22, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote: > We have a web application that uses Jenkins CI for keeping our staging server > up to date via svn update. > > Due to not thinking abut it properly in the beginning, > The staging site is actually a working copy of the entire repo (branche

Re: Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory

2011-05-10 Thread Gavin Beau Baumanis
2011 3:22 >> To: Subversion Users >> Subject: Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory >> >> Hi there, >> >> We have a web application that uses Jenkins CI for keeping our staging > server >> up to date via svn update. >> >> Due to not thin

RE: Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory

2011-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Gavin "Beau" Baumanis [mailto:gavin.bauma...@palcare.com.au] > Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 3:22 > To: Subversion Users > Subject: Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory > > Hi there, > > We have a web application

Chkeckout only a portion of a repoistory

2011-05-10 Thread Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
Hi there, We have a web application that uses Jenkins CI for keeping our staging server up to date via svn update. Due to not thinking abut it properly in the beginning, The staging site is actually a working copy of the entire repo (branches and tags included) We however, only require the tr