On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Clay Porter wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Everything is working now (see inline below). I can't thank you enough
>> for your help with this.
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Andreas Stieger
>> wrote:
>>>
On 14.05.2015 19:47, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Clay Porter wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Everything is working now (see inline below). I can't thank you enough
>> for your help with this.
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Andreas Stieger
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Clay Porter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Everything is working now (see inline below). I can't thank you enough
> for your help with this.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Andreas Stieger
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 12/05/15 18:27, Clay Porter wrote:
>>> svn: E175002
Hello,
Everything is working now (see inline below). I can't thank you enough
for your help with this.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/05/15 18:27, Clay Porter wrote:
>> svn: E175002: GET request failed: 400 Bad request
>> There is no corresponding err
Hello,
On 12/05/15 18:27, Clay Porter wrote:
> svn: E175002: GET request failed: 400 Bad request
> There is no corresponding error in the Apache HTTP logs.
>
> svn: E200014: Checksum mismatch for
>expected: 4b4ef9e3432aa84aed190457b68c01ad
> actual: 863b9f52f352a5cb20298ef0eecb9e97
>
We recently upgraded our Subversion server from 1.6 to 1.8 and since
then some of our users
our reporting problems checking out certain folders using a 1.8
client. The issues occur whether using TortoiseSVN 1.8.x or any 1.8
CLI client on Windows/Cygwin/Linux.
We have verified that these operatio
