Re: Case-only renames

2011-10-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 21, 2011, at 04:18, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Sounds like it's worth filing an issue with the APR folks about this > if there isn't one already. I couldn't find one so I filed this: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068

Re: Case-only renames

2011-10-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 03:34:38AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Nope, all Macs ever made, from the Macintosh 128K 27 years ago right > through current Macs with the latest OS X, have used case-insensitive > filesystems by default. Several popular OS X GUI apps, especially by > big publishers like M

RE: Case-only renames

2011-10-21 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com] > Sent: vrijdag 21 oktober 2011 5:49 > To: Subversion Users > Subject: Case-only renames > > The Subversion 1.7 release notes say: > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/rel

Re: Case-only renames

2011-10-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 21, 2011, at 03:17, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > But I'm not completely sure that this means it won't work on OSX + > case-insensitive fs. Maybe, in the absence of truepath-conversion, it > already "just works", without jumping through hoops ... I'm not a Mac > user myself, so I can't test thi

Re: Case-only renames

2011-10-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > The Subversion 1.7 release notes say: > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#windows-case-change > >> Changing case of file and directory names on Windows >> >> Subversion on Windows now fully supports changing the case o

Case-only renames

2011-10-20 Thread Ryan Schmidt
The Subversion 1.7 release notes say: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#windows-case-change > Changing case of file and directory names on Windows > > Subversion on Windows now fully supports changing the case of file and > directory names. No more special workarounds, a

Re: Merging case-only renames to branch

2010-11-15 Thread Erik Huelsmann
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Weintraub wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Becroft >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We've recently had to rename a couple of files on trunk by case only >> > (e.g. >> > FOO.C to foo.

Re: Merging case-only renames to branch

2010-11-15 Thread Daniel Becroft
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Weintraub wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Becroft > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've recently had to rename a couple of files on trunk by case only > (e.g. > > FOO.C to foo.c), which we did via a URL-only rename. This worked > perfectly. > > >

Re: Merging case-only renames to branch

2010-11-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Can you try with a newer 1.7 build? Re FOO->foo or foo->FOO, I suspect it's because we iterate some hash table's keys (so the order of iteration is unpredictable). Daniel (it's actually a thread for dev@) Daniel Becroft wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:12:39 +1000: > Hi, > > We've recently had

Re: Merging case-only renames to branch

2010-11-15 Thread David Weintraub
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > Hi, > > We've recently had to rename a couple of files on trunk by case only (e.g. > FOO.C to foo.c), which we did via a URL-only rename. This worked perfectly. > > We then encountered a strange error when attempting to merge this revision >

Merging case-only renames to branch

2010-11-14 Thread Daniel Becroft
Hi, We've recently had to rename a couple of files on trunk by case only (e.g. FOO.C to foo.c), which we did via a URL-only rename. This worked perfectly. We then encountered a strange error when attempting to merge this revision across to our release branch. Because the revision contains both an