On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 23.04.2013 16:29, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> > Guten Tag Charles Gallo,
> > am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie:
> >
> >> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble
> >> mumble) wants the info in the act
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> You clearly have never had to deal with the more Neanderthal species of
> auditor who believe meaningful technological advance stopped about 200
> years before Gutenberg.
Can't they at least deal with a web view generated by viewvc or
web
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500:
> >> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain
> >> these comments, then you're talking about several scripts: one that
> >> the developers must invoke in place
On 23.04.2013 16:29, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Charles Gallo,
> am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie:
>
>> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble
>> mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I
>> explained that all the info
On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Maybe there are other solutions, but there's a limit to how much I'm
> willing to think about this particular requirement in my spare time.
Ok guys, don't worry about it. I was sort of hoping someone had a semi easy
way. Not worth the pai
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 16:52:10 -0500:
>
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500:
> >> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain
> >> these comments, then you're talking about sever
On Apr 23, 2013, at 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500:
>> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain
>> these comments, then you're talking about several scripts: one that
>> the developers must invoke in place of "svn c
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500:
> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain
> these comments, then you're talking about several scripts: one that
> the developers must invoke in place of "svn commit" to commit their
> work, which transforms their
Guten Tag Charles Gallo,
am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie:
> Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble
> mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I
> explained that all the info is in blame/SVN, but they actually said
> "the auditor
On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:47 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote:
>
> Get different (and clueful) auditors?
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
I think it is more the client. I've pointed out their options, so I'm trying to
automate a pain
On 04/22/2013 08:55 PM, Charlie Gallo wrote:
>
> On 4/22/2013 Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Charles Gallo wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 16:13:25 -0400:
>>> Any ideas on how to do this? Probably some sort of pre commit hook, but...
>
>> but pre-commit hooks can't modify the in-flight txn without brea
On Apr 23, 2013, at 6:31 AM, "Bert Huijben" wrote:
>
> To get you the 'svn blame' / 'svn annotate' output your Subversion client
> reads all the full versions of the file that existed since the file was
> created. The current format is just one of the possible output formats that
> we can calcu
On 23.04.2013 08:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> If you want to prevent deletions of lines, install a pre-commit hook that
> enforces that rule.
That would be quite hard to enforce, since it's not obvious just from
looking at (e.g., diffing) two files which lines were actually deleted
by the user. Diff
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 23 april 2013 08:46
> To: Charles Gallo
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 15:13, Cha
On Apr 22, 2013, at 15:13, Charles Gallo wrote:
> Ok, IMHO, they are good enough, but not for my current client. They basically
> want to append the Equivalent of blame or annotate to the actual source
> code lines!
>
> So say in c# you'd see
>
> A++ //CAG 2013-04-13
>
> Yep, they also don
On 4/22/2013 Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Charles Gallo wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 16:13:25 -0400:
>> Any ideas on how to do this? Probably some sort of pre commit hook, but...
> but pre-commit hooks can't modify the in-flight txn without breaking the
> committing working copy.
Ouch...
So, ide
Charles Gallo wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 16:13:25 -0400:
> Any ideas on how to do this? Probably some sort of pre commit hook, but...
but pre-commit hooks can't modify the in-flight txn without breaking the
committing working copy.
Hey Gang,
Ok, IMHO, they are good enough, but not for my current client. They basically
want to append the Equivalent of blame or annotate to the actual source code
lines!
So say in c# you'd see
A++ //CAG 2013-04-13
Yep, they also don't want you deleting code, you comment it out...
Their lo
18 matches
Mail list logo
