Re: Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Thomas S. Trias
Stefan, I had thought the same about the diff implementation; I guess it pays to search the issue tracker. I will keep on chugging along until such time as diff is fixed. Thanks, Thomas S. Trias Senior Developer Artizan Internet Services http://www.artizan.com/

Re: Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:33:23AM -0500, Thomas S. Trias wrote: > Some of our utilities require a list of changed paths for a > revision, including the sub-paths included in a directory delete / > replace / copy. For the replace, the ideal situation is to capture > a set of deletes, replaces, and

Best way to capture implicit affected paths for a revision

2010-03-15 Thread Thomas S. Trias
Some of our utilities require a list of changed paths for a revision, including the sub-paths included in a directory delete / replace / copy. For the replace, the ideal situation is to capture a set of deletes, replaces, and adds for the descendants. We started out using a combination of svn