Re: Behaviour on minor .control misconfiguration

2011-02-22 Thread David Brodbeck
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Daniel creo Haslinger < creo-23985-subvers...@blackmesa.at> wrote: > I am not sure if it is proper behavior to ignore a whole file instead > of a single misconfigured line. > > Of course there might be some reason to do this I'm not aware of, > but I can't think o

Re: Behaviour on minor .control misconfiguration

2011-02-20 Thread Daniel creo Haslinger
Hi Daniel, thank you for your reply. Are you aware of the svnauthz-validate utility? (Try 'make svnauthz-validate' in a Subversion source tree) I am indeed aware of the validation utility, but although the users have the chance to check their configuration I am not sure if it is proper behav

Re: Behaviour on minor .control misconfiguration

2011-02-20 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Are you aware of the svnauthz-validate utility? (Try 'make svnauthz-validate' in a Subversion source tree) Daniel creo Haslinger wrote on Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 01:49:21 +0100: > Hey there, > > I'm here to ask you if this the following is intended behaviour > and - if it really IS - if one should

Behaviour on minor .control misconfiguration

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel creo Haslinger
Hey there, I'm here to ask you if this the following is intended behaviour and - if it really IS - if one should consider to think over it again. I'm not sure if this should go to dev@, but I decided to start at users@ first ;-) We're serving a medium sized Subversion userbase ( ~ 400 users ), r