>
> Yes
>
Thank you all for valuable comments on this migration from 32 bit to
64 bit! It is well understood.
Regards
Ravi.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:40:02 +0200:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> > Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
> > am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 23:49 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > > As of 1.7, all FSFS on-disk formats are architecture-independent.
> >
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
> am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 23:49 schrieben Sie:
>
> > As of 1.7, all FSFS on-disk formats are architecture-independent.
>
> Glad I'm updated few months ago, thanks. :-)
I believe FSFS repositorie
Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 23:49 schrieben Sie:
> As of 1.7, all FSFS on-disk formats are architecture-independent.
Glad I'm updated few months ago, thanks. :-)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-sof
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:58:18PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Thorsten Sch?ning wrote on Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:35:53 +0200:
> > Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
> > am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 10:11 schrieben Sie:
> >
> > >>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
> > > My repository backen
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:29:09PM +0200, Thorsten Sch?ning wrote:
> Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
> am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 22:58 schrieben Sie:
>
> > (Now, as it happens, between 1.6 and 1.7 in FSFS they didn't. But they
> > did in 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8.)
>
> And what does that mean, that with
Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 22:58 schrieben Sie:
> (Now, as it happens, between 1.6 and 1.7 in FSFS they didn't. But they
> did in 1.5, 1.6, and 1.8.)
And what does that mean, that with older or newer versions one won't be
able to just copy/move the repo files from 3
Thorsten Schöning wrote on Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:35:53 +0200:
> Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
> am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 10:11 schrieben Sie:
>
> >>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
> > My repository backend is FSFS.
> > So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anyth
Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 10:11 schrieben Sie:
>>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
> My repository backend is FSFS.
> So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anything known?
I moved my repos now from Windows 32 Bit to Ubuntu 64 Bit and co
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
> I really don't know, but my quoted answer is form Stefan Sperling, one
> of the Subversion core developers and if he says you don't have to
> worry, I wouldn't. :-) In fact, I'm doing the same migration today
> while
Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 10:11 schrieben Sie:
>>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
> My repository backend is FSFS.
> So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anything known?
I really don't know, but my quoted answer is form Stefan Sperlin
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
Thanks Thorsten for quick response.
>> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
My repository backend is FSFS.
So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anything known?
Thanks!
Guten Tag Ravi Roy,
am Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2012 um 08:32 schrieben Sie:
> Is there a possiblity of incompatibilities between 32 bit sqlite and
> 64 bit sqlite in terms of migration of repositories?
I think this was answered before:
> It depends on the Subversion repository backend.
>
> If the B
Hi Everyone,
I have one master and two write-through proxy running on CentOS 5.4,
LDAP, Apache httpd 2.2.21 with Subversion 1.6.1 -- 32 bit. Becuase of
memory requirements and efficient use of hardware resource pool, I
plan to migrate to 64 bit OS and rest of the stuff.
Is there a possiblity of in
14 matches
Mail list logo
