Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andreas Krey wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:08:18 +0200: > ldd already tells me the line 'libz.so => /usr/lib/libz.so' > which is a bit irritating because why did get-deps pull zlib in the > first place when it uses the system one? Looking at build/ac-macros/zlib.m4 I don't see any special

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-19 Thread Andreas Krey
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:36:28 +, Philip Martin wrote: > Andreas Krey writes: ... > I think that is a zlib symbol. Subversion links some libraries against > zlib but doesn't link executables to zlib directly, relying on the > library to pull them in. If you build using > > make EXTRA_LDFLAGS=

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-19 Thread Philip Martin
Andreas Krey writes: > + svn commit -m 1 > Adding kadr.polon.p > Transmitting file data .ld.so.1: svn: fatal: relocation error: file > /export/home/krey/svn17/lib/libsvn_delta-1.so.0: symbol compressBound: > referenced symbol not found I think that is a zlib symbol. Subversion links

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andreas Krey wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:19:29 +0200: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:21:12 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Andreas Krey wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 23:15:29 +0200: > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:12:47 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > ... > > > > - those foo.h file generated from foo

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Krey
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:21:12 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Andreas Krey wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 23:15:29 +0200: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:12:47 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > ... > > > - those foo.h file generated from foo.sql files are supposed to be > > > pre-generated in the tarball >

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andreas Krey wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 23:15:29 +0200: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:12:47 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > ... > > - those foo.h file generated from foo.sql files are supposed to be > > pre-generated in the tarball > > They are. Except that I copied over the tree, and the timestamps

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Krey
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:12:47 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: ... > - those foo.h file generated from foo.sql files are supposed to be > pre-generated in the tarball They are. Except that I copied over the tree, and the timestamps afterwards were so that it tought it necessary to recreate. Ouch. Ok,

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andreas Krey wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 21:58:27 +0200: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:53:31 +, Andreas Krey wrote: > ... > > none ./build/transform_sql.py > > subversion/libsvn_subr/internal_statements.sql > > ./subversion/libsvn_subr/internal_statements.h > > Hmm. Actually it seems tht that t

Re: 1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Krey
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:53:31 +, Andreas Krey wrote: ... > none ./build/transform_sql.py subversion/libsvn_subr/internal_statements.sql > ./subversion/libsvn_subr/internal_statements.h Hmm. Actually it seems tht that the python detection is skimpy. Is that required? Andreas -- "Totally triv

1.7.0 does not build on Solaris9

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Krey
When building subversion 1.7.0 on Solaris9 I get a strange error: /bin/bash /export/home/krey/sub1.7.0/libtool --tag=CC --silent --mode=compile gcc -DSOLARIS2=9 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -g -O2 -g -O2 -pthreads -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS -I./subversio