Please send this to dev@, it's more likely to get some attention there.
http://subversion.apache.org/patches
Thanks
Stéphane Gaudreault wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 18:00:18 -0400:
> Le 20 juin 2011 15:28:32, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:54:12AM -0400, Stéphane Gaudr
Sorry, I didn't. I haven't gotten the thread updates and didn't find the
time to do cross-version checks of perl + swig + svn.
Stéphane's patch fixes it though so I don't know if an issue is
still necessary.
Le 20 juin 2011 15:28:32, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:54:12AM -0400, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> > Le 19 juin 2011 13:53:12, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:43:31PM +0200, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> > > > So does this qualify as a proper bug? C
Otto Allmendinger googlemail.com> writes:
> So does this qualify as a proper bug? Can I add this to the issue tracker?
Did you ever file a bug report for this? I'm having the same issue and I'd like
to keep tabs on the status of a resolution.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:54:12AM -0400, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Le 19 juin 2011 13:53:12, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:43:31PM +0200, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> > > So does this qualify as a proper bug? Can I add this to the issue
> > > tracker?
> >
> > Yes, plea
Le 19 juin 2011 13:53:12, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:43:31PM +0200, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> > So does this qualify as a proper bug? Can I add this to the issue
> > tracker?
>
> Yes, please add it.
>
> Someone will need to pin down where the problem is coming from.
>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:43:31PM +0200, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> So does this qualify as a proper bug? Can I add this to the issue tracker?
Yes, please add it.
Someone will need to pin down where the problem is coming from.
Is it SWIG? Is it Perl? Is it Subversion?
Can you try to reproduce t
So does this qualify as a proper bug? Can I add this to the issue tracker?
Update:
The problem seems to affect the i686 architecture and does not
manifest under x86_64:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24540
> The debian bug report you linked says this might be a problem with SWIG.
> What version of SWIG are you using?
I'm using swig 2.0.4 where the bug is supposed to be fixed.
Svn is compiled against that version, the errors still occurs.
Output of "make test" in bindings/swig/perl/native:
https://
Otto Allmendinger wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 13:24:17 +0200:
> # git svn rebase
> Bizarre copy of UNKNOWN in subroutine entry at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/SVN/Base.pm line 80.
>
We need more information.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Otto Allmendinger wrote:
> The perl bindings don't work with the newest version of that manifests
> with "git svn", the reasons are unclear though
>
> I'm using Arch Linux
>
> # pacman -Q subversion perl git
> subversion 1.6.15-1
> perl 5.14.0-1
> git 1.7
The perl bindings don't work with the newest version of that manifests
with "git svn", the reasons are unclear though
I'm using Arch Linux
# pacman -Q subversion perl git
subversion 1.6.15-1
perl 5.14.0-1
git 1.7.5.2-2
# git svn rebase
Bizarre copy of UNKNOWN in subroutine entry at
/usr/lib/perl
13 matches
Mail list logo
