Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:48:56 +0200: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:20:27 +0200: > > > So 'svn status -u' is a better equivalent to 'hg incoming' than > > > 'svn log -rBASE:HEAD'. But, in

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:20:27 +0200: > > So 'svn status -u' is a better equivalent to 'hg incoming' than > > 'svn log -rBASE:HEAD'. But, in most cases, the log command will show > > what you're interested in.

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:20:27 +0200: > So 'svn status -u' is a better equivalent to 'hg incoming' than > 'svn log -rBASE:HEAD'. But, in most cases, the log command will show > what you're interested in. For completeness, using 'svnversion' in combination with 'svn log' can

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:31:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > Seems nice. Although I still personally feel that command line user > > interfaces need unification. > > I've committed the change. Thanks for starting this dis

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > Seems nice. Although I still personally feel that command line user > interfaces need unification. I've committed the change. Thanks for starting this discussion! I understand the rationale behind trying to unify interfaces and

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:12:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> As I said `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody >> proficient enough to know about it. > > I'm not convinced that we need another subcommand for this. > > If

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:12:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > As I said `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody > proficient enough to know about it. I'm not convinced that we need another subcommand for this. If users have trouble discovering this functionality, what about putt

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Andy Levy wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:55 AM, anatoly techtonik > wrote: >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: Hi, Mercurial has a very convenient comm

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:55 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is >>> basically "what's new" for in

RE: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Andreas Tscharner
> > Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is > > For clarification what "hg incoming" means: > "hg incoming" shows the changesets that are new on the server > and that will come if the user says "hg pull"... > > The equivalent command for subversion would be a preview what > c

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:55:48PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > The required functionality (without diffs) in svn is implemented as: >svn log -r BASE:HEAD > > What I want is a usability fix - command that corresponds to the > actual action user has in head: > 1. "check if there are any in

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is >> basically "what's new" for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add >> the same capability to S

RE: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Andreas Tscharner
> Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is For clarification what "hg incoming" means: "hg incoming" shows the changesets that are new on the server and that will come if the user says "hg pull"... The equivalent command for subversion would be a preview what changes "svn

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > Hi, > > Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is > basically "what's new" for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add > the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, > but not everybod

Re: 'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread Giulio Troccoli
On 08/05/12 15:33, anatoly techtonik wrote: Hi, Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is basically "what's new" for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody proficient enough to know abo

'svn incoming'

2012-05-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
Hi, Mercurial has a very convenient command "hg incoming" which is basically "what's new" for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody proficient enough to know about it. Please, CC. -- anatoly t.