Hi,
On 1. 7. 2010 22:11, Bob Archer wrote:
>
> Basically if you merge changes in a sub-folder that subfolder will get
> mergeinfo on it. That info won't be on trunk. So, I would verify that all the
> merge info on /trunk is in place.
>
>
>
> Another think is that if you mostly use feature bra
rev. If it did that mergeinfo can be promoted up to the /trunk
> folder.
>
>
>
> Good luck.
>
>
>
> BOb
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sNop [mailto:sn...@seznam.cz]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:47 PM
> *To:* Bob Archer
> *Subject:* Re: Big problem with
Hi Bob,
first I want to thank you for you reaction.
On 1. 7. 2010 20:33, Bob Archer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have big problems with reintegrating feature branches. I have
>> this problem only with one reposity location.
>>
>> I show it on example:
>> 1) I create branch ( feature branch )
>> 2) I sw
On 1. 7. 2010 20:41, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 14:11, sNop wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have big problems with reintegrating feature branches. I have this problem
>> only with one reposity location.
>>
>> I show it on example:
>> 1) I creat
Hi,
I have big problems with _reintegrating feature branches_. I have this problem
only with *_one reposity location_*.
_I show it on example_:
1) I create branch ( _feature branch_ )
2) I switch to this branch
3) *_I change/edit only one file in this feature branch!_* and commit ( the
filenam
Hi,
I have big problems with reintegrating feature branches. I have this
problem only with one reposity location.
I show it on example:
1) I create branch ( feature branch )
2) I switch to this branch
3) I change/edit one file in this feature branch and commit ( the
filename which i change is
*_a
Hi all,
> Well, I, for one, would need the Apache 2.2 bindings but I do not need
> the Python bindings at all, which I suspect most users don't either.
> So basic binaries with 2.2 support would be perfect for starters
>
The same, only need Apache 2.2 modules and compiled subversion, other
bindin
Hi Dave,
Dne 2. 3. 2010 19:42, David Darj napsal(a):
> Then I would gladly take over and build upcoming versions for the
> community.
>
> /David
>
That would by cool.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dne 1. 3. 2010 15:09, Olivier Sannier napsal(a):
> There is the svn_load_dirs.pl script but it's not very intuitive to use.
> For those who are under Windows, I wrote a wizard based tool that
> manages those externals for you.
> Its sources (Delphi 2009) are available here:
>
> http://svnwintools.t
Dne 1. 3. 2010 15:09, Olivier Sannier napsal(a):
> Bojan Resnik wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We have a custom server setup and we have been using Tigris.org
>> binaries for Windows. The latest version there, however, is 1.6.6.
>> Will there be Tigris.org binary packages for Windows for Subversion
>> 1.6.9 and
10 matches
Mail list logo