I disagree: I still use svn because of its centralized nature and good
native out-of-the-box handling of large binary files. Git will never really
check those boxes.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 4:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:42 PM wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I found the explan
options to switch,
merge, etc. I suppose directions like that may have been taken before with
svn wrapper systems, but those never catch on or survive unless they are
upstream.
<>< <>< <><
Bryce Schober
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:43 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On
I just noticed that whenever we do a remote rename (from URI to URI, as opposed
to in a working copy), svn add mergeinfo that didn't exist before. It doesn't
do this for renames in a working copy. Is this by design, or by accident?
