> -Original Message-
> From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM
> To: Cooke, Mark
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson
> Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
>
> On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark w
Resnik [mailto:resn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2010 8:32 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
2010/3/3 Olivier Sannier
Troy Simpson wrote:
For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we really
need to support all the
For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we really
need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
Heap, but now that we don't have that, do we really need to ditch all
windows builds? What we could look at is a standard base-level windows
build
.
It is my opinion that the project should have a ‘supported’ release to assist
with bug finding and to provide end-users with a standard base-level release.
Regards,
Troy Simpson
From: Olivier Sannier [mailto:obo...@free.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2010 8:03 AM
To: sNop
Cc
