Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-26 Thread Roman Naumenko
Branko Čibej said the following, on 25-04-14, 4:26 PM: On 25.04.2014 19:09, Roman Naumenko wrote: That was a known consequence of moving to SQLite for storage of the metadata. SVN 1.8 offers a solution for those that can use it: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-25 Thread Roman Naumenko
- Original Message - > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Roman Naumenko < ro...@naumenko.ca > > wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Mark Phippard < > > > markp...@gmail.com > > > > >

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-25 Thread Roman Naumenko
- Original Message - > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Mark Phippard > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Florian Ludwig > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> this topic was raised several times in the past - the answers > >> range from > >> "will be better/solved in the next version 1

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-24 Thread Roman Naumenko
Grierson, David said the following, on 23-04-14, 5:47 AM: Latency Numbers Every Programmer Should Know: https://gist.github.com/jboner/2841832 Always useful to have in mind when considering your benchmarking environment. Looks like svn checkouts repos on Windows strictly through Netherlands.

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-24 Thread Roman Naumenko
Johan Corveleyn said the following, on 22-04-14, 9:30 AM: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Florian Ludwig wrote: From your numbers I deduce that the performance degradation can be attributed partly to NTFS vs. ext4, and partly to Windows7 vs. Linux: * NTFS vs. ext4: roughly a factor 3 slower.

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

2014-04-24 Thread Roman Naumenko
Florian Ludwig said the following, on 16-04-14, 1:13 PM: Hi, this topic was raised several times in the past - the answers range from "will be better/solved in the next version 1.7" or "it is due to ntfs vs ext3/4" or it's the AV, network setup or the Windows file indexing service. After dis

Re: Unsubscribe

2013-08-28 Thread Roman Naumenko
Geoff Field said the following, on 28-08-13 2:04 AM: From: Andreas Mohr Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 15:49 PM On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:07:15PM +1000, Geoff Field wrote: You need to send an email to [1]users-unsubscr...@subversion.apache.org to unsubscribe from this list. ...as ca

Re: Balancing and proxing

2013-08-09 Thread Roman Naumenko
Ryan Schmidt said the following, on 09-08-13 9:15 PM: On Aug 9, 2013, at 19:00, Roman Naumenko wrote: Ryan Schmidt said the following, on 09-08-13 7:12 PM: You can configure any number of read-only slaves which maintain copies of the master repository with a very slight delay. The mirroring

Re: Balancing and proxing

2013-08-09 Thread Roman Naumenko
Nico Kadel-Garcia said the following, on 09-08-13 6:45 PM: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote: Hi, I wanted to check if it's possible to configure subversion in master-slave mode with some sort of common URL on the proxy server or loadbalancer, so end users wouldn't bother w

Re: Balancing and proxing

2013-08-09 Thread Roman Naumenko
Ryan Schmidt said the following, on 09-08-13 7:12 PM: On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:40, "Naumenko, Roman" wrote: I wanted to check if it's possible to configure subversion in master-slave mode with some sort of common URL on the proxy server or loadbalancer, so end users wouldn't bother with different n