Justin
Have you tried setting the windows command line to code page 936 (this is
listed as the correct code page for simplified Chinese in Windows (see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd317756(v=vs.85).aspx
)
You should be able to set the code page using the command *cp 936
Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Rob Pointer
> wrote:
>
>> Forgive me if I am misunderstanding here however SVN clients cannot be
>> 'forward' compatible. i.e. an svn 1.4 client will not work with a 1.6
>> server (repository format differs) and checking out in this ma
; with
> > >
> > > The old syntax is recognized by all servers and clients, and the help
> > > output documents exactly which syntaxes are not compatible with older
> > > (<=1.4) clients.
> > >
> > And RHEL 4 comes with subversion 1.1.1. It'
you get someone to say 'no we didn't
do it that way, we did it this way' :) :)
However your reply tells me that you also jumped to a conclusion of your
own about what I was saying ;)
On 9 December 2011 16:54, Rob Pointer wrote:
> Oh and Stefan
>
> "Again, please ve
Oh and Stefan
"Again, please verify that you're invoking the tool in the right way
before jumping to conclusions."
Jumping to conclusions is the only way I get exercise :) :)
On 9 December 2011 16:52, Rob Pointer wrote:
> Stefan
> That's exactly what I was saying, th
t 01:05:02PM +, Rob Pointer wrote:
> > Mark
> > If you put changes multiple times from trunk to a branch (in development
> > terms, a re-base) you can cause reflective merges and actually cause more
> > problems. The recommended merge back into trunk is a reintegrate
merging FROM trunk
INTO branch. It should most definitely be FROM branch INTO trunk. (excuse
the caps, I don't have the ability from here to make my text bold :) )
Rob
On 9 December 2011 12:44, Rob Pointer wrote:
> I have been looking through this thread and it might be resolved.
>
>
t you modified the same line in the file in two branches (i.e. trunk
and branch1) and the text is identical. Again not sure if 1.7 fixes this,
but it is definitely present in 1.6.x
Rob
On 9 December 2011 12:49, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Ro
ock revisions
> you don't want to merge by marking them as already merged, see
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.branchmerge.advanced.html#svn.branchmerge.advanced.blockchanges
>
--
*Rob Pointer MSc*
Software Specialist and Consultant
rpoin...@clearvision-cm.com
*
