Re: Apache httpd 2.4 + Subversion 1.9.5 + LDAP combination does not work on CentOS 7.x

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > >> You should remove these lines: >> >> Satisfy any >> Order allow,deny >> Allow from all >> AuthUserFile /dev/null >> >> >> then add >> >> Satisfy a

Re: Apache httpd 2.4 + Subversion 1.9.5 + LDAP combination does not work on CentOS 7.x

> > > You should remove these lines: > > Satisfy any > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > AuthUserFile /dev/null > > > then add > > Satisfy all > > > I also suggest you add the HEAD method to the LimitExcept directive. > > > Thanks Branko for quick response, i've added updated

Apache httpd 2.4 + Subversion 1.9.5 + LDAP combination does not work on CentOS 7.x

Hi I've been using Apache httpd 2.2.23 with Subvesion 1..6.21 with LDAP on CentOS 5.11 (old setup) for years now. Recently we planned to upgrade to Subversion 1.9.x with Apache httpd 2.4.x, i've prepared the setup as per the following with LDAP support : 1) compiled and installed Apache 2.4.16 fr

Re: Can not compile Apache subversion 1.9.5 on CentOS 7 (64 bit).

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > I'm guessing you ran configure in the same directory you had earlier > attempted to run autogen.sh in? That'd explain why config.sub is > broken. Try extracting the tarball again (to a new directory) and > run configure in that (new) tre

Re: Can not compile Apache subversion 1.9.5 on CentOS 7 (64 bit).

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Why are you running autogen.sh? If you build from a released tarball, > you don't need to run autogen at all; just configure and make. (And > none of them needs to be run as root) > > Running autogen.sh is only needed when building from

Can not compile Apache subversion 1.9.5 on CentOS 7 (64 bit).

Hi, I've successfully built subversion 1.6 on CentOS 5.9 in past and using it for years now., now we plan to upgrade it to Subversion 1.9.5. Version of CentOS is also upgraded to 7 but i'm getting the following error while I run : sudo ./autogen.sh buildcheck: checking installation... buildcheck

(20014)Internal error: proxy: error reading status line from remote server

Hi List, I have posted this question on apache httpd server mailing list too, but I did not get any response, since this problem is related to subversion write-through proxy, so people may have idea or pointers. My sincere apology if this is not the right forum to discuss about this problem. Here

Re: SVN repositorires migration using svnsync and master information in repos.

> am Samstag, 30. März 2013 um 09:59 schrieben Sie: > No, there was a similar discussion recently: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201303.mbox/%3c21DA556C6089D34FB2D99CC5FB0422C306BB18EC@lux-mail2.luxembourg.intrasoft-intl.private%3e Thanks Thorsten for the reply and

SVN repositorires migration using svnsync and master information in repos.

Hi, I'm in process of migrating my repos from 'master host' to larger disk to resolve the space issues on a 'new master host'. I have compiled and installed Subversion 1.6.18, Apache 2.23 on CentOS 5.9 in a new Virtual Machine (as 'new master host'). I have migrated all repositories using 'svnsyn

Re: Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit

> > Yes > Thank you all for valuable comments on this migration from 32 bit to 64 bit! It is well understood. Regards Ravi.

Re: Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Ravi Roy, > I really don't know, but my quoted answer is form Stefan Sperling, one > of the Subversion core developers and if he says you don't have to > worry, I wouldn't. :-) In fact, I'

Re: Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: Thanks Thorsten for quick response. >> It depends on the Subversion repository backend. My repository backend is FSFS. So, do you mean I can go ahead safely without worring anything known? Thanks!

Advice on migration from 32 bit platform to 64 bit

Hi Everyone, I have one master and two write-through proxy running on CentOS 5.4, LDAP, Apache httpd 2.2.21 with Subversion 1.6.1 -- 32 bit. Becuase of memory requirements and efficient use of hardware resource pool, I plan to migrate to 64 bit OS and rest of the stuff. Is there a possiblity of in

Re: Path based access control based commits are not getting transferred to proxy [Solved]

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > Users of groups repo-admins, project-managers, developer-group1, > developer-group2 can browse the and commit to their respective permissions > area without any issue, all commits are replicated to proxy except > "/trunk/secr

[Solved] : Question about 'svn move' and commit behaviour in the repository.

It got me crazy, I can see the folder as well logs too.. but I do not know how it happened. I will try to reproduce it again, if it was not my mistake also it may be the case that I tried the things in an un-expected way. Sorry for noise! Thanks all for quick support. RR.

Re: Question about 'svn move' and commit behaviour in the repository.

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: Right, and important to understand: you didn't even need to have a working > copy to do that. Because you used URLs to the repository, the copy happened > directly in the repository. Thanks Ryan, I have re

Re: Question about 'svn move' and commit behaviour in the repository.

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: Thanks Thorsten for your reply. > Where did you right click to show the log, in the WC, before or after > running update or in the repo browser? What are the settings about > ignoring paths etc. in the log dialog? > Right clicked using

Question about 'svn move' and commit behaviour in the repository.

Hi all, Sorry, in case it is answered before, but could not find by googling. I'm running Subversion 1.6.1 with apache httpd 2.2.11 with LDAP on CentOS 5.x. I have following structure of the repository named MyRepo : /trunk - folderA/ - folderB/ - folderC/ /trunk has these three folde

Re: Delta source ended unexpectedly [500, #200003] using Subversion 1.6.17 with Apache http server 2.2.21

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ravi Roy wrote: > > Hello community, > > > > I have compiled subversion 1.6.17 and Apache 2.2.21 from source on CentOS > > 5.6 and serving my repository using Apache httpd

Re: Delta source ended unexpectedly [500, #200003] using Subversion 1.6.17 with Apache http server 2.2.21

> So you're running a master/slave setup with a write-through proxy > configuration, yes? You don't mention whether you're quoting logs > from the master or from the slave server. > I apologize; yes I am running master/slave setup with a write-trough proxy. Logs belong to Master. > > Is the

Re: Delta source ended unexpectedly [500, #200003] using Subversion 1.6.17 with Apache http server 2.2.21

I found this under http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=193527 in the mail archive of dated back to 2002 and this seems to be fixed as per the bug report. Can somebody please comment on the issue? Thanks. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Ravi Roy w

Delta source ended unexpectedly [500, #200003] using Subversion 1.6.17 with Apache http server 2.2.21

Hello community, I have compiled subversion 1.6.17 and Apache 2.2.21 from source on CentOS 5.6 and serving my repository using Apache httpd server with the following details : Server version: Apache/2.2.21 (Unix) Server loaded: APR 1.4.5, APR-Util 1.3.12 Compiled using: APR 1.4.5, APR-Util 1.3.1

Re: Setting auto-props from Server side ?

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > On Jun 7, 2010, at 00:01, Ravi Roy wrote: > > > Just curious if there is a way out to set auto-props for certain binary > files on server side ? > > No, there isn't, not a sup

Setting auto-props from Server side ?

Hi, Just curious if there is a way out to set auto-props for certain binary files on server side ? I know, it is can be set on Client like TortoiseSVN. I am using Subversion 1.6.1 on CenOS 5.2 with APR 1.2.7. Thanks. Regards -RR

Re: Size of SVN Transaction vs Actual commit size

> > > > Thanks Olivier; but this is just abstract view; I want to compute the > > transaction size based on some predefined value (say 5 MB) and > allow commit > > to the repository if transaction size (in case new file commit) is less > than > > or equal to this size. > > > > Any idea you have ? >

Re: Size of SVN Transaction vs Actual commit size

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote: > Ravi Roy wrote: > >> Actual commit size is 1.28 MB and this script gives me 5528 bytes. >> Something wrong with script or there is compression involved or what ? >> > Well, reading the book could have tol

Re: Size of SVN Transaction vs Actual commit size

> >> Can somebody throw some light on this please? > > This question is both confused and confusing. You'll have more success > if you use established subversion terminology correctly and avoid > making up your own terminology without defining it. > > (I know it's a bit of a chicken-and-the-egg pr

Re: Size of SVN Transaction vs Actual commit size

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > Hi > > General question about Transaction size versus actual file commit size. I > am getting strange results when I am trying to commit 1.28 file and > transaction size I am getting is 5538 bytes. Does somebody knows the mystery

Size of SVN Transaction vs Actual commit size

Hi General question about Transaction size versus actual file commit size. I am getting strange results when I am trying to commit 1.28 file and transaction size I am getting is 5538 bytes. Does somebody knows the mystery ? I expect transaction size to be the same as actual commit size ? or some

Re: What file system structure a SVN transaction follow ?

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Itamar O wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt > > wrote: > >> > >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 04:52, Ravi Roy wrote: > >> > >

Re: What file system structure a SVN transaction follow ?

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Itamar O wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt > > wrote: > >> > >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 04:52, Ravi Roy wrote: > >> > >

Re: What file system structure a SVN transaction follow ?

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2010, at 04:52, Ravi Roy wrote: > > > I am writing a custom hook (pre-commit) to find out the size of the > transaction for certain size and then allow / disallow com

What file system structure a SVN transaction follow ?

Hi All I am writing a custom hook (pre-commit) to find out the size of the transaction for certain size and then allow / disallow commit. But I am not sure what is the structure under /db/transactions which should be checked for size ? Thanks for help. -RR

Re: Repository size not decreasing after deleting a file.

2010/4/20 Ulrich Eckhardt > On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ravi Roy wrote: > > I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also > decrease > > the size of the repository, but this is not true. > > Thanks to all of you for quick replies. Suppose somebody adde

Repository size not decreasing after deleting a file.

Hi, I was curious to know if deleting a file from the repository also decrease the size of the repository, but this is not true. To verify this, I check the size of the repository before adding 30 MB data into into, after adding I again checked the size of the repository it is still the same. Is

Re: Mechanism to list files in SVN repository greater than certain size

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:43 PM, David Weintraub wrote: > Are you looking for current versions or all versions of all file file? Thanks David, I was in fact looking for to restrict / inform people who has put file greater than certain size in the repo. I think for future would be better to wri

Mechanism to list files in SVN repository greater than certain size

Hi Does somebody knows a mechnism as how to scan existing SVN repositories for files (say which are > 5 MB) ? and get details of the same. Thanks! -RR

Re: Powered by Subversion footer is missing

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 2010, at 07:21, Ravi Roy wrote: > > > I have installed CollabNet subversion 1.6.6, everything seems fine but I > can not see footer "Powered by Subversion version 1.6.6&q

Re: Powered by Subversion footer is missing

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > > >>> The signature is no longer displayed if the Apache httpd directive > >>> "ServerSignature off" is specified in the conf file. Since this > >>> directive tells Apache not to advertise its version (or even that it > >>> is Apache) we dec

Re: Powered by Subversion footer is missing

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: The signature is no longer displayed if the Apache httpd directive >> "ServerSignature off" is specified in the conf file. Since this >> directive tells Apache not to advertise its version (or even that it >> is Apache) we decided to do the s

Powered by Subversion footer is missing

Hi All I have installed CollabNet subversion 1.6.6, everything seems fine but I can not see footer "*Powered by **Subversion* *version 1.6.6" * if I open the server URL in IE or Firefox*.* Does somebody have any clue what I am missing ? or it has to be confiured some

Re: Question about maximum size of svn repository (svn 1.6.1, backend as FSFS)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > On Mar 21, 2010, at 08:00, Ravi Roy wrote: > > Right -- at least not due to APR. Not sure if your server's OS or > filesystem might impose limitations of their own. If you think you&#

Re: Question about maximum size of svn repository (svn 1.6.1, backend as FSFS)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: > > On Mar 21, 2010, at 05:56, Ravi Roy wrote: > > You'll have to ask the server administrator what version of APR is > installed there. I don't know of a wa

Re: Question about maximum size of svn repository (svn 1.6.1, backend as FSFS)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 21, 2010, at 05:56, Ravi Roy wrote: > You'll have to ask the server administrator what version of APR is installed > there. I don't know of a way to check it remotely. > Thanks Ryan for you quick reply. I will check that. -RR

Re: Question about maximum size of svn repository (svn 1.6.1, backend as FSFS)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Ravi Roy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, David Weintraub wrote: > How big is your project that you are worried about possible > limitations? Give us an idea of possible size issues, and someone on > the list with a similar sized project

Question about maximum size of svn repository (svn 1.6.1, backend as FSFS)

Hi I was googling if there is a limitation for the size of the subversion repository but could not find a relevent answer.. Does somebody know about or can throw some light please ? I am using subversion 1.6.1 ..backend as FSFS on Centos 5.2. Thanks. - RR