(perhaps we should move to the dev-list? i'm not expert of this, i'll follow
the thread)
I've removed code references cause i'm asking a few more "conceptual"
questions here, to understand if we can simplify the detection avoiding the
diff. Fire me if i become trivial.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:0
ts or analyzing
code for the solution? Do you have already a clear list of shortcomings to
be fixed before starting to implement this kind of detection?
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:13:14PM +0200, Paolo Compieta wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2
Attaching also the complete script for Win7.
(i already sent the template to the dev list)
Paolo
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Paolo Compieta wrote:
> Please find attached the repro-template(s) to reproduce the case in Ubuntu
> and Win7.
>
> Cheers,
> Paolo Compieta
>
Please find attached the repro-template(s) to reproduce the case in
Ubuntu and Win7.
Cheers,
Paolo Compieta
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Paolo Compieta wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a first post, hope it's well written and clear. I've found this
> (candidate-)bug while at w
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This is a remaining task tracked in this issue:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3150#desc4
>
> I would expect this feature to appear in the 1.8 or a later release.
>
+1 to put this in 1.7, or one more 1.6.x
In my c
;t rise any conflict or warning, discarding all
modifications in the branch
Expected behavior:
TREE CONFLICT: the directory being deleted in the branch
has changed from the merge's initial revision (see "Use
Case 5" and "Equality of directories" in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/notes/tree-conflicts/detection.txt)
Cheers,
Paolo Compieta
