in working copies). To me a line in revision graph showing when two
branches are merged would be just a visual representation of the already
existing svn:mergeinfo. I can select to "show merged versions" in the log -
isn't that just a textual representation of the graph I looking for?
// Olof Wolgast
2016-06-11 21:53 GMT+02:00 Branko Čibej :
> On 11.06.2016 21:39, Olof wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2016-06-11 20:03 GMT+02:00 Branko Čibej > <mailto:br...@apache.org>>:
> >
> > On 11.06.2016 19:48, Olof wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
&g
2016-06-11 20:03 GMT+02:00 Branko Čibej :
> On 11.06.2016 19:48, Olof wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Perhaps someone here can bring some light to this topic.
> >
> > We use the common technique with a trunk and feature branches. A
> > feature branch is created by
wn as updated at next SVN
update command. Why is this necessary? Is it a desirable behavior?
Shouldn't SVN be able to figure our what's actually changed in the feature
branch relative to trunk and record only this mergeinfo?
Olof Wolgast