On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:15 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:47 PM Magnus Lyrberg
> wrote:
> > Thank you. This is very similar to our current solution. It would
> > however be nice to avoid a lot of empty commits, hence my
> > engagement in this lis
ry similar to our current solution. It would
however be nice to avoid a lot of empty commits, hence my
engagement in this list asking for alternative solutions.
But perhaps there are none.
Best regards
Magnus Lyrberg
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 11:05 AM Magnus Lyrberg
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:51 PM Johan Corveleyn
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 2:21 PM Magnus Lyrberg
> > > > Is there some other
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:51 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 2:21 PM Magnus Lyrberg
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm not subscribed so please CC me in any response.
> >
> > Is there some other way besides making a bunch of
s not very important,
we are ok to start from scratch, but loosing the revision number
would be incredibly costly.
Is there some other way besides making a bunch of dummy commits
to reach our current revision number in a new repository?
Best regards
Magnus Lyrberg
