On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 03:01 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 3/7/14, 2:46 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> > Trying to access the issue tracker, but subversion.tigris.org is
> > dropping connections.
>
> It's working for me now.
>
Me too.
Thanks, all. I'll keep quiet if it hiccups again ;-)
--Kyle Sluder
Trying to access the issue tracker, but subversion.tigris.org is
dropping connections.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014, at 04:18 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> And if I replace the "…branches/4.0.2" with "…trunk", I can see all the
> revisions that haven't been merged from trunk yet.
Hmm, I spoke too soon:
% svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible -r202859 ${Reposit
the version bundled with the latest stable release of Xcode).
Thanks for the assistance,
--Kyle Sluder
s --revision under "Valid options"?
Is there another way to do what I want?
--Kyle Sluder
; issue then it will abort the merge operation.
You cannot execute hooks on a client machine. Hooks are server-side
only.
--Kyle Sluder
ave any implications for higher levels of the stack—for example, would
a DAV client be confused that a supposedly-locked collection has
changed?
--Kyle Sluder
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/14, 7:02 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>> I understand that implementing this would require all commits to search
>> for lock properties on every ancestor of every changed file or
>> directory. It essentia
nexpected files.
I understand that implementing this would require all commits to search
for lock properties on every ancestor of every changed file or
directory. It essentially amounts to an extension of inheritable
properties to the RA layer. Which would be pretty neat, IMO. :)
Shall I file a featur
