Re: Unreferenced pristines behavior in 1.7

2011-11-30 Thread Joshua McKinnon
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > They do. For every changed file that comes to exist in the sandbox > a new pristine copy will be lying around; after committing twenty versions > of a file you have nineteen unreferenced pristines there. > > ... >> I am actually in the process

Re: Unreferenced pristines behavior in 1.7

2011-11-29 Thread Joshua McKinnon
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > Note that the difference is that now your pristines are shared.  So if > you have files in your working copy that are identical there is only a > single pristine.  Imagine a checkout of an entire repository, > including tags and branches.  Fo

Unreferenced pristines behavior in 1.7

2011-11-29 Thread Joshua McKinnon
Can anyone comment on the state of unreferenced items not being deleted in the pristine area in 1.7? The release notes state there are plans to purge unreferenced items automatically, but the issue link appears to be a placeholder (excerpt from 1.7 release notes) : Note: In 1.7, we recommend to r