:53AM +0100, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
Jedit is maintained as an svn repository. I have read only access to
it. I mentioned hg only because I got in touch with it in another
project. I would like to stay with bare svn, as hg generated patches
may differ in format.
I would recommend using hg
Jedit is maintained as an svn repository. I have read only access to it.
I mentioned hg only because I got in touch with it in another project. I
would like to stay with bare svn, as hg generated patches may differ in
format.
Andreas Tscharner pisze:
I see. Could you please help me establish a
ze:
Guten Tag Jarek Czekalski,
am Montag, 14. November 2011 um 08:13 schrieben Sie:
Is Mercurial simply better in this case?
Yes, because with every clone, or however it is called in hg, in
distributed version control systems you always have your own copy of a
repository which you can work
Hi
I finished working on a patch A and posted it to acceptation. I would
like to keep this patch applied in my working copy and work on another
patch B. I don't see any way to do this, except having my own svn
repository. But with Mercurial it was easy:
1. Revert all
2. Apply patch A throuch
