such serious issues ever since version 1.3
(1.0/1.1 were a very different matter and had us dropping SVN
altogether until 1.3 after coming all the way through 0.24). No
other programs were added/updated recently.
Thank you for your attention.
Jan Hendrik
Concerning Re: svnadmin load to fsfs 9 times f
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote on 31 May 2010, 10:30, at least in part:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> > I've never really been much of a user of the BDB back end. I
> > started with Subversion in the 1.3 time-frame and have always used
Concerning Re: Tigris binary packages for Wind
Olivier Sannier wrote on 3 Mar 2010, 11:27, at least in part:
> Troy Simpson wrote:
> > For base-level support, we narrowed that down to apache 2.2x. Do we really
> > need to support all the python builds? They were a great service from D.J.
> > Heap
Hi all!
I know and appreciate that the binaries are provided by volunteers,
so please take this at the actual value of the subject: as a question
not of when, but on the status.
Checking now and then for new versions at tigris there are only
binaries for 1.6.6 from late October. Getting kind
