Re: Nginx reverse proxy corrupting filenames

2024-06-21 Thread Gustavo Chaves
Em qui., 20 de jun. de 2024 às 16:15, Daniel Sahlberg escreveu: > > Have you seen the FAQ item about reverse proxies: Yes, I have. > I have absolutely no experience with Nginx but this seems to set the > Destination header, much like the examples in the FAQ for IIS. But it seems > it keep the

Nginx reverse proxy corrupting filenames

2024-06-20 Thread Gustavo Chaves
I have a Subversion vesion 1.14.1 running behind a reverse proxy implemented by nginx version 1.18.0 on a Ubuntu 22.04 server. I'm having problems renaming files in it. I came up with the following procedure to reproduce the problem: > $ export LANG=C.UTF-8 > $ export LANGUAGE=en > $ REPO=https:/

Segmentation fault in "svn resolve"

2016-06-14 Thread Gustavo Chaves
I got a "segmentation fault" while performing a "svn resolve" to resolve a conflict in a file with the svn:mime-type property set to application/octet-stream. I got the same error using the WANdisco packages for svn-1.9.4 at RHEL and using Ubuntu 16.04 native package for svn-1.9.3. I was able to r

Re: svn (un)lock commands succeed when pre-(un)lock hooks fail on svn 1.9

2015-08-22 Thread Gustavo Chaves
2015-08-22 21:22 GMT-03:00 : > Can you confirm that the file is locked after the command? (E.g. by > running svn status on the target) > > Does it lock the file when the hook blocks it… or does ‘svn lock’ return > success? > No, it doesn't. Look at these comnands, using svn 1.9, first without a h

svn (un)lock commands succeed when pre-(un)lock hooks fail on svn 1.9

2015-08-22 Thread Gustavo Chaves
Hi there, It seems that svn 1.9 changed the behaviour of the "svn lock" and the "svn unlock" commands with regards to the fate of the corresponding pre-lock/pre-unlock hooks. Up to svn 1.8, when those hooks failed (exit code != 0) the commands (svn lock/unlock) failed too. Now, on svn 1.9, the c

Re: "400 Bad Request" on commit with 1.7 client to 1.7 server

2011-12-05 Thread Gustavo Chaves
On 5 dez, 09:13, Philip Martin wrote: > Your problem with POST requests is not yet understood.  It's might be > some overlap between Subversion directives in your apache config, or > between Subversion directives and non-Subversion directives.   Only you > can really identify the problem at presen

Re: "400 Bad Request" on commit with 1.7 client to 1.7 server

2011-12-05 Thread Gustavo Chaves
On 5 dez, 05:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/12/4 Gustavo Chaves : > > There are known problems with handling of POST requests in 1.7.0 an 1.7.1. > > In 1.7.2 changes list that is mentioned as > * make mod_dav_svn ignore non-Subversion POST requests (r1187695) > > T

Re: "400 Bad Request" on commit with 1.7 client to 1.7 server

2011-12-04 Thread Gustavo Chaves
Just one more information. I was using the packages CollabNetSubversion-extras and CollabNetSubversion-server version 1.7.0-2. I've just upgrade them to version 1.7.1-1 but the problems remain. -- Gustavo.

Re: "400 Bad Request" on commit with 1.7 client to 1.7 server

2011-12-04 Thread Gustavo Chaves
I straced the httpd daemon to try to get any hint. The last syscalls before the error are these: 17748 read(18, "POST /admin/!svn/me HTTP/1.1\r\nUs"..., 8000) = 441 17748 stat("/l/home1/svn/admin/htdocs/admin/!svn/me", 0x7fffce99c130) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) 17748 lstat("/l", {st_m

Re: "400 Bad Request" on commit with 1.7 client to 1.7 server

2011-12-04 Thread Gustavo Chaves
On 1 dez, 22:29, Mark Phippard wrote: > > Subversion Edge does not have the location block for SVN in the > httpd.conf file.  Have you customized the configuration files beyond > this?  There is no reason you should have to add that directive > anyway. > > Assuming you are using the default config