Shall I file a bug report for this and/or provide additional information?
Kind regards,
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Grabner Markus [mailto:markus.grab...@alicona.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2015 12:00
An: 'Philip Martin'
Cc: &#x
g/?p=jerry/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.git
Kind regards,
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. September 2015 11:00
An: Grabner Markus
Cc: 'Branko Cibej'; users@subversion.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: NT
richt-
Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2015 14:21
An: Grabner Markus
Cc: 'Branko Cibej'; users@subversion.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: NTLM authentication in subversion 1.9.0?
Grabner Markus writes:
> I see. Shall I
. September 2015 11:59
An: users@subversion.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: NTLM authentication in subversion 1.9.0?
On 11.09.2015 11:51, Grabner Markus wrote:
>> Is there any chance you could test this with Subversion 1.8.14? There
>> was a significant change in authz behaviour in 1.8.4/1.9+ in
> Is there any chance you could test this with Subversion 1.8.14? There
> was a significant change in authz behaviour in 1.8.4/1.9+ in combination
> with apache 2.4.16 and later.
I now installed the httpd server and mod_authn_ntlm from
https://www.apachehaus.com and subversion 1.8.13/1.8.14 from
Hi!
I tried to setup apache-2.4 + subversion-1.9.0 + mod_authn_ntlm on Windows to
implement a subversion server with single sign-on, and finally found a working
configuration (see below). However, the configuration contains the deprecated
"Satisfy" directive, I therefore have some ques
Hi all!
The new "automatic merge" feature in subversion 1.8 look promising, but in our
case prevents merging the trunk into a branch since subversion incorrectly
interprets this operation as a reintegration merge and complains about missing
revisions which should have been merged first
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Giulio Troccoli [mailto:giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk]
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Jänner 2012 17:48
> An: Grabner Markus
> Cc:
> Betreff: Re: bi-directional merging?
>
>
>
> On 16/01/12 16:08, Grabner Markus wrote:
>
Hi!
I have a few questions regarding a particular subversion usage scenario. We
are two teams, each working on more or less unrelated portions of a common code
base. To isolate each team from stability issues introduced due to the work of
the other team, we consider creating a sepa
