Re: Performance of svn+ssh vs. file for multiple files

2010-07-08 Thread Eric Peers
On 07/08/2010 02:27 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Eric Peers wrote on Wed, 7 Jul 2010 at 04:44 -: Incidentally, where is [svn_ra_reparent] defined??? I can't find it in the libraries, but I see it in libsvn_ra-1.so but not in the libsvn_ra directory... % grep svn_ra_reparent

Re: Performance of svn+ssh vs. file for multiple files

2010-07-06 Thread Eric Peers
On 07/06/2010 06:16 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Eric Peers [mailto:e...@missinglinktools.com] Sent: dinsdag 6 juli 2010 22:46 To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of svn+ssh vs. file for multiple files Good suggestion

Re: Performance of svn+ssh vs. file for multiple files

2010-07-06 Thread Eric Peers
010 12:52 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Have you tried using SSH port forwarding instead of svn+ssh://? Daniel (perhaps one of the other devs will address the points you made; I'm myself not familiar with that part of the code) Eric Peers wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2010 at 21:17 -: Howdy, I'

Performance of svn+ssh vs. file for multiple files

2010-07-06 Thread Eric Peers
Howdy, I've got a program that needs to checkout specific files at specific versions. In this particular case a branch does not make sense. I have found that the performance of svn+ssh in this case is very bad. I run the rough equivalent of: svn update -r 2 file1 file2 file3 file4 file5 svn u