On 4 October 2015 at 13:32, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 12:52:33PM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>> I would maybe suggest introducing an option for disabling the entire
>> automatic property subsystem, i.e. it combines both of these, and
>> o
]On 3 October 2015 at 13:19, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:13:08AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>> is it really not a bug when:
>>
>> enable-auto-props = yes
>>
>> and:
>>
>> enable-auto-props = no
>>
>
On 3 October 2015 at 11:01, Greg Stein wrote:
> I do understand this, but this is not a "bug". It is how Subversion is
> designed to work. For strange edge cases, the xml people want content to be
> labeled application/xml rather than a text subtype. ... I *do* understand
> that this negatively im
On 3 October 2015 at 01:05, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>>...
>> As this bad behaviour can be so incredibly damaging for this
>> repository,
>
> Note: the files themselves are not "damaged" -- Sub
On 2 October 2015 at 12:30, Philip Martin wrote:
> "Edward d'Auvergne" writes:
>
>> I was wondering if there was anything that has been missed here? Is
>> this a real bug? The svn:mime-type property is not needed and is not
>> desired for any file
On 2 October 2015 at 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if this should be considered a bug. At the FlightGear
>> project we have a 6 GB data svn repository for aircr
Hi all,
I was wondering if this should be considered a bug. At the FlightGear
project we have a 6 GB data svn repository for aircraft (
https://sourceforge.net/projects/flightgear/ ,
https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/fgaddon/HEAD/tree/ ). A large
quantity of the files, almost 30,000 in number
