On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>>
>>> You said you dumped and loaded your repository. You also have
>>> corruption shown by apache that is not shown by svnadmin. When you
>>> dump/load are you also putting the new repository in the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Curt Sellmer writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>>> On 9/11/13 12:24 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>>&
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Curt Sellmer writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> On 9/11/13 12:24 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>>> Here is a tail of the error.log. This is from when I was running the
>>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On 9/11/13 12:24 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>> Here is a tail of the error.log. This is from when I was running the
>>> tests earlier.
>>> I was hoping t
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 9/11/13 12:24 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> Here is a tail of the error.log. This is from when I was running the
>> tests earlier.
>> I was hoping to pinpoint which set of log messages corresponded to
>> each error
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Lieven Govaerts
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>>>> That thought had crossed my mind
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
> That thought had crossed my mind, but so far none of the other users
> who are still using 1.7 clients have had any issues and also running
> the 1.8.1 client on the server box using the file:// scheme has never
> produced an e
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> That thought had crossed my mind, but so far none of the other users
>> who are still using 1.7 clients have had any issues and also running
>> the 1.8.1 client on
:41 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> I now have svn 1.8.3 with serf 1.3.1. I am not seeing the "svn:
>> E120104: ra_serf: An error occurred during decompression" error as
>> often at the moment. Have seen it a few times.
>>
>> But I do intermittently
- /usr/lib/sasl2/libotp.2.so (Intel 64-bit)
- /usr/lib/sasl2/libplain.2.so (Intel 64-bit)
- /usr/lib/sasl2/libpps.so (Intel 64-bit)
- /usr/lib/sasl2/mschapv2.so (Intel 64-bit)
- /usr/lib/sasl2/pwauxprop.so (Intel 64-bit)
- /usr/lib/sasl2/shadow_auxprop.so (Intel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 9/10/13 2:31 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> After giving it more time I can now reproduce the problem with both
>> version 1.8.0 and 1.8.3 of the client. And I have now seen the
>> problem with both the older and newer versi
st prefers bottom-posting or inline replying, so I've
> rearranged to put your reply at the bottom. More below. ]
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Curt Sel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Curt Sellmer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> [ Please use reply all to keep the list in the loop -- I'm sending
>> this to users@ rather than dev@, because other users might also be
>> interested and/
13 matches
Mail list logo
