On 1/22/2015 8:09 AM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Thank you very much for your efforts. Could you please post a trace for a
> non-existing path, but not for the one ending with rev-prop-atomics.shm?
> Try "\MyRepo\db\should-not-ever-exist" and maybe "\MyRepo\this-one-too".
If I change the file name to
On 1/21/2015 10:41 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Cory Riddell writes:
>
>> On 1/20/2015 9:32 AM, Cory Riddell wrote:
>>> I'm trying to use hotcopy to create a backup of my repositories on a
>>> network drive. When I run the hotcopy command, most of the reposit
On 1/21/2015 11:44 AM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> On 1/21/2015 10:41 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Cory Riddell writes:
>>
>>> On 1/20/2015 9:32 AM, Cory Riddell wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to use hotcopy to create a backup of my repositories on a
>>>> n
On 1/20/2015 9:32 AM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> I'm trying to use hotcopy to create a backup of my repositories on a
> network drive. When I run the hotcopy command, most of the repository
> copies, then I get an error:
>
> E:\>svnadmin hotcopy E:\MyRepo \\Diskstation\svn\MyR
I'm trying to use hotcopy to create a backup of my repositories on a
network drive. When I run the hotcopy command, most of the repository
copies, then I get an error:
E:\>svnadmin hotcopy E:\MyRepo \\Diskstation\svn\MyRepo
svnadmin: E720002: Can't remove file
'\\diskstation\svn\MyRepo\db\rev-prop
On 10/11/2011 2:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/11 Cory Riddell :
>> I have a working copy that insists it has an external but I can't figure
>> out why.
>>
>> "svn propget svn:externals -R wc" returns no results.
>> "svn status wc
I have a working copy that insists it has an external but I can't figure
out why.
"svn propget svn:externals -R wc" returns no results.
"svn status wc" reports this:
"X wc\util.lib"
How do I reconcile what's going on here? When I do "svn update wc" it
just hangs.
Cory
Markus,
On 9/26/2011 1:45 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Just a suggestion: Set up a second repository just aside your primary
> one, and put the 3rd party stuff there. You can then use svn:externals
> to include the libraries in your regular project trees.
Using externals seems to be the way to go.
On 9/23/2011 3:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
>> I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
>> application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
>> files from the past.
&
I'm thinking about committing all the third party libraries that our
application depends on to make it easier to checkout a buildable set of
files from the past.
Some of the libraries are around a gigabyte each. Right now our
repository has around a decade of history and is 5 GB. If we start
stuff
On 12/8/2010 10:37 PM, Cory Riddell wrote:
> Is there some way to tell subversion to merge but ignore externals?
I couldn't find any way to accomplish what I was trying to do. Instead,
I removed all the svn:externals properties. It makes setting up a new
dev machine more difficult, but it
Our project has several sub-trees that are included via the externals
mechanism. When I'm working in a branch and try to merge from the trunk,
it takes about 15 minutes and brings my machine to its knees because all
of my RAM (4GB) is used and it starts swapping heavily. In the end,
every single fi
Uli,
On 7/8/2010 10:39 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
>
> Other than that, what Les Mikesell said might be true, i.e. that you need to
> dump/reload your repository in order to reap the benefits of newer server
> versions.
>
Going to do a backup/dump/reload this weekend.
> There is one other w
On 7/8/2010 7:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Was the server upgraded from a pre-1.6 version without changing the
> repository?
No. It was created at version 1.6. All the data was imported from a
Visual SourceSafe repository.
Cory
On 7/8/2010 3:59 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
>
> Of course, the complexity (i.e. memory and time) for a merge operation
> increases with the number of revisions and the number of files, but a mere VS
> upgrade should only touch projectfiles and maybe a few sourcefiles, all of
> which are easy to
Hi Uli,
> > Things have checked out and now we want to upgrade. I want to swap my
> > trunk and my branch.
>
> This sounds strange now. Normally, you would merge the branch back into the
> trunk. Also, what about the changes made to the trunk since you made the
> branch? Do you want to discard th
We are about to upgrade to a new Visual Studio. While preparing for the
upgrade, I created a branch call VS2010 to test our software and make
sure everything is working before moving everybody to the new IDE.
Things have checked out and now we want to upgrade. I want to swap my
trunk and my branch
17 matches
Mail list logo
